Simply don't understand this need for the ref to go to the monitor, simply to preserve the idea that he's the one in charge. Basically every time VAR gets involved the ref is no longer in charge, and occasionally does overturn the on field ref (should probably happen more often). So if the VAR ref can overrule the on field ref for certain things, why does the on field ref have to make a decision on other matters, which will involve slowing the game down further?
Somebody might want to tell the Greasy Rat that his attempt to one-up Gareth Bale's manbun are doomed to failure... please log in to view this image
We will be battered stupid by the best team in England and Europe. Anything less than a 5 goal loss will be a great achievement...nope... not joking... we are shockingly bad at the moment.
I’d go to the pub first, get hammered and then the game, probably be much more enjoyable in that order
I detect an element of pessimism here. What's up. You're at the Lane and we've got to get beaten some time
Liverpool haven’t lost a league game in over a year, Spurs have been gash for over a year. Common sense says Liverpool win.
You are in the best form of your premier league life and we have struggled all season and have a defence that my sons under 16s could play through at the moment, so the idea of coming against your strikers is a frightening proposition - So yes we will either win the luckiest 1-0 or lose 0-6
Had he arched his back and two footed him with studs to the chest and stomach you would have a very valid point there As it is you just seem desperate to deflect from Son's nasty streak