Rival watch

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
D.G.C. talking ****e again

Also failing to copy & paste an article from the Daily ****ing Star properly

You must log in or register to see images

You must log in or register to see images

You must log in or register to see images

You must log in or register to see images

You must log in or register to see images

You must log in or register to see images
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rocky blue army and Dier Hard
C. Kane said:
I feel I was a bit harsh on you last time I was on the forum but honestly DGC you do yourself zero favours posting bollocks like this.
Click to expand...
I'm not looking for favours C.Kane and be as harsh as you like. I didn't say I wanted him at Spurs, I was merely asking for thoughts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BobbyD
deedub93 said:
She always had a way with words but even she would be speechless after reading some of the drivel DGC sprouts out. You might just about have got 'F*ck off you dozy c*nt out of her'.
Click to expand...
Who's always had a way with words deedub? Drivel? Is it drivel when we were winning with Kane out?
 
humanbeingincroydon said:
D.G.C. talking ****e again

Also failing to copy & paste an article from the Daily ****ing Star properly

You must log in or register to see images

You must log in or register to see images

You must log in or register to see images

You must log in or register to see images

You must log in or register to see images

You must log in or register to see images
Click to expand...
Tetchy.
 
deedub93 said:
Mother Theresa
Click to expand...
What about the last part of my post deedub? Was it drivel when I said keep Kane benched against Burnley? No, we lost didn't we? I say drop him to return to winning ways, that might sound desperate but we're in a desperate situation. You're over praising his achievement at Dortmund when all he did was to score to make it 4-0 on aggregate, they wouldn't have scored 4 to beat us. For all you know it just might be that his usefulness with us is coming to an end and it's time for him to move on.
 
D.G.C. said:
What about the last part of my post deedub? Was it drivel when I said keep Kane benched against Burnley? No, we lost didn't we? I say drop him to return to winning ways, that might sound desperate but we're in a desperate situation. You're over praising his achievement at Dortmund when all he did was to score to make it 4-0 on aggregate, they wouldn't have scored 4 to beat us. For all you know it just might be that his usefulness with us is coming to an end and it's time for him to move on.
Click to expand...
Everyone has their sell by date, I'd suggest Kane's will be between 2027 and 2030. And we've lost games before when Kane has played without being rushed back, so yes, Drivel.
 
  • Like
Reactions: humanbeingincroydon
deedub93 said:
Everyone has their sell by date, I'd suggest Kane's will be between 2027 and 2030. And we've lost games before when Kane has played without being rushed back, so yes, Drivel.
Click to expand...
There's another article about Kane only being half fit, I agree with that or are we both talking drivel deedub?

There's talk EVERYWHERE about Poch moving on and I'm just posting about possible replacements. I've said Conte IF Poch leaves and I've also read the opinions of others that he's taken us as far as he can. Look at Liverpool now with a top name, that's exactly what we need.
 
D.G.C. said:
There's another article about Kane only being half fit, I agree with that or are we both talking drivel deedub?

There's talk EVERYWHERE about Poch moving on and I'm just posting about possible replacements. I've said Conte IF Poch leaves and I've also read the opinions of others that he's taken us as far as he can.
Click to expand...
You said Maureen a couple of hours ago. Make your mind up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: humanbeingincroydon
D.G.C. said:
What about the last part of my post deedub? Was it drivel when I said keep Kane benched against Burnley? No, we lost didn't we? I say drop him to return to winning ways, that might sound desperate but we're in a desperate situation. You're over praising his achievement at Dortmund when all he did was to score to make it 4-0 on aggregate, they wouldn't have scored 4 to beat us. For all you know it just might be that his usefulness with us is coming to an end and it's time for him to move on.
Click to expand...

I find it funny that you’re essentially not happy with Kane scoring to make it 4-0 on aggregate when you were the very person who found fault at the fact we chose to ease up in the 3-0 win at Cardiff where you felt we should’ve tried to score more and more and waste energy.

If the anti-Kane agenda wasn’t so blindingly obvious, people might take your posts a bit more seriously and have genuine debate. Most actually agree rushing him back was a poor choice but when you’ve honestly contemplated (and continue to do so) the idea that selling arguably the best striker in world football right now would be of benefit to a side like Tottenham - who can’t exactly attract the world stars that Utd/ City can when losing a key player - it results in many choosing to make fun at your posts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Huddlefro, crackerman jack, BrunelGooner and 4 others
Dier Hard said:
I find it funny that you’re essentially not happy with Kane scoring to make it 4-0 on aggregate when you were the very person who found fault at the fact we chose to ease up in the 3-0 win at Cardiff where you felt we should’ve tried to score more and more and waste energy.

If the anti-Kane agenda wasn’t so blindingly obvious, people might take your posts a bit more seriously and have genuine debate. Most actually agree rushing him back was a poor choice but when you’ve honestly contemplated (and continue to do so) the idea that selling arguably the best striker in world football right now would be of benefit to a side like Tottenham - who can’t exactly attract the world stars that Utd/ City can when losing a key player - it results in many choosing to make fun at your posts.
Click to expand...
Make as much fun as you like but we've always found scorers haven't we? Jimmy Greaves, Martin Chivers, John Duncan, Clive Allen, Teddy Sheringham, Robbie Keane, Dimitar Berbatov and now Harry.

Now it's been said many times that Kane might be off to Madrid or Man Utd hasn't it? It's been said on other websites that Kane's comeback has coincided with a loss of form. It's no good having a good striker if we're going to lose to relegation candidates is it?

Now, Benitez is another name which has been touted to takeover if Poch Leaves and I'd say yes to that. In fact I'd take Conte, Benitez or Ancelotti before I'd consider Mourinho. I hope you too don't read things which don't exist into my posts like deedub does. I never said I wanted Mourinho but his brain somehow contrived to say that I did say that. What's wrong with posting from football sites and asking for thoughts?
 
Last edited:
D.G.C. said:
Make as much fun as you like but we've always found scorers haven't we? Jimmy Greaves, Martin Chivers, John Duncan, Clive Allen, Teddy Sheringham, Robbie Keane, Dimitar Berbatov and now Harry.

Now it's been said many times that Kane might be off to Madrid or Man Utd hasn't it? It's been said on other websites that Kane's comeback has coincided with a loss of form. It's no good having a good striker if we're going to lose to relegation candidates is it?

Now, Benitez is another name which has been touted to takeover if Poch Leaves and I'd say yes to that. In fact I'd take Conte, Benitez or Ancelotti before I'd consider Mourinho. I hope you too don't read thing which don't exist into my posts like deedub does. I never said I wanted Mourinho but his brain somehow contrived to say that I did say that. What's wrong with posting from football sites and asking for thoughts?
Click to expand...

Kane is already the fourth highest goal scorer in our history at the age of 25. Without Kane’s goals over the years we’d still be crying over the loss of Bale as we were dreadful after he left and had to endure Soldado up front. Keep pushing your agenda because of these last four games though to justify getting rid of a guy who can potentially go down as one of the clubs’ best ever players, if he’s not already done so.

Of course you’d say yes to Benitez, you’d probably say yes to Pardew or Warnock because it suits the notion of getting rid of Poch.

Nothing is wrong with posting on the forum and asking for thoughts, people are giving you their thoughts.
 
Dier Hard said:
Kane is already the fourth highest goal scorer in our history at the age of 25. Without Kane’s goals over the years we’d still be crying over the loss of Bale as we were dreadful after he left and had to endure Soldado up front. Keep pushing your agenda because of these last four games though to justify getting rid of a guy who can potentially go down as one of the clubs’ best ever players, if he’s not already done so.

Of course you’d say yes to Benitez, you’d probably say yes to Pardew or Warnock because it suits the notion of getting rid of Poch.

Nothing is wrong with posting on the forum and asking for thoughts, people are giving you their thoughts.
Click to expand...
I would not say yes to Pardew or Warnock and I suppose you don't like Benitez because he managed a club you don't like as per deedub who doesn't like Conte merely because he coached Chelsea. Did anyone hate Klopp at Dortmund? No, some people only hate him because he's at Liverpool. Now, thoughts like that are drivel, hating a coach because he coached another team. Benitez is a top name and would be good for us AS WOULD CONTE. I don't possess these PETTY prejudices of yours and deedub's Dier.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back