- May 22, 2011
- 73,762
- 25,700
- 113
Once again, Chelsea only needed a draw and sat back and played for it.
Boring to watch, but it's effective.
Boring to watch, but it's effective.
So chelsea had just 3 shots on goal?
I expect an indepth investigation and it to be plastered on the back page (aswell as take up the entire pull out) slamming them for it.
Once again, Chelsea only needed a draw and sat back and played for it.
Boring to watch, but it's effective.

confusing the result with the manner of getting the result.
[HASHTAG]#inwayoveryourhead [/HASHTAG]
So own goals dont count?
Interesting.
[HASHTAG]#doesntknowtherules[/HASHTAG]
So own goals dont count?
Interesting.
[HASHTAG]#doesntknowtherules[/HASHTAG]
Offside goalsdon'tshouldn't count though
The point is you scored one goal, the lucky rebound for Failcao to latch on to, that needed 2 defenders to be sleeping, and needed OG and offside to get the other two to beat leicester.
[HASHTAG]#vanGaalforlife[/HASHTAG]
Offside goalsdon'tshouldn't count though

[HASHTAG]#onegoal[/HASHTAG]So what you are saying is.... We scored three goals to comfortably beat Leicester.
[HASHTAG]#onegoal[/HASHTAG]
Are you trying to say [HASHTAG]#owngoal[/HASHTAG]?
Offside goal....goal....own goal
[HASHTAG]#onelegitgoal[/HASHTAG]
So.... Own goals dont count?


The point is you scored one goal, the lucky rebound for Failcao to latch on to, that needed 2 defenders to be sleeping, and needed OG and offside to get the other two to beat leicester.
[HASHTAG]#vanGaalforlife[/HASHTAG]
Ever head of using more than one display?How do you know, was you not watching your Game instead
And RVP was just onside
Yeah but the banner headlines are way over the top.
Leicester are bottom of the league ffs.![]()
