Rival Watch Thread Watch

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/footb...sea-rickie-lambert-liverpool-transfer-5635162

 

Strange as it seems wild suit chelsea more than us.

The hey play with a target man up front and play off... He wouldn't play much but suits their style more than us who try and play with quick mobile forwards.


I think he'd turn them down though, at his age he has 1 or 2 more seasons left and he strikes me as either wanting to stay with us or going somewhere for first team football for his last few years.

 

I don't think Lambert's been given a good enough chance. At a time when we were/are without a goal scorer or established goal scoring pair, BR could have given him and Lallana a decent run out. I doubt he'll go to Chelsea.

 

Lambert?

The ****?
We may aswell keep Drogba as third choice if we are going to replace him with Lambert.
Even a geriatric Drogba has a better goals/games ratio since rejoining us.

 

I don't know. I think he may turn it down because it's Chelsea and he's a boyhood Liverpool fan but equally think he may go there as it would present him with a chance to add medals to his career (he's not staying with us is he)

 

Lambert to Chelsea?

Yeah that's likely.....

 

You could get Balotelli instead

 

Didn't you say Lambert was better than Benteke...?

 

i think we are forgetting rickie lambert playing a few in a row prior to sterling at no 9.

after 5 he was washed out. Couldn't hack it. We did give him a chance. Rodgers then refused utterly to give him any more game time which i view as the error if any.

I think its utterly mad story with no realism as a foundation whatsoever so is only good for joking about.

 

I'm going to go sisu in a minute ffs.

 

He played about five or six in a row but he was done after two or three, Brod just persisted because he presumably felt we had little other option.

 

yeah he waited til lambert was totally ****ed until he was forced to try sterling... #luckedoutagain.

In fairness lambert got a few mins here and there but since then rodgers went on a run and really didn't use lambert as a plan b at any time or even to come on with 20mins to go and see out a game and rest anyone... which prob cost him in the end

Lambert's just slow as **** and we don't know how to play with him in the side. we don't get beyond him or close to him as a target man do we.

cheslea would know how to use him or indeed drogba and get a result... ergo link.. which is extremely silly.

 

I can see how people would think that Lambert may be utilised better in our squad due to the way we play, i suppose thats where the link stems from.
But really, I would be happier sticking Patrick Bamford in our squad and giving him a few appearances in the PL, see how he handles it.
Hopefully Costa's gimpy hamstring will be better next season

 

Moaninho use a youth player? More chance of us winning the league!

 

Lambert needs to play every week and I'm sure he knows that.

He'll go to promoted side or somewhere like Stoke.

 

I know I know.
I said I would be happier to do that.
Doesnt mean it is likely to happen!

 

Stoke are above Everton.

 

................and your point is?

 

Why would he join a club above Everton but not Everton?

He'd do as good a job for Everton as he would for Stoke.

 

Yeah mate, like Big Lambo would get a place in our side ahead of Lukaku.

Stoke have Diouf and The Freak ffs.