yep you dont like finding the proof YOU want when the search link name is applied for you have a nice day
Totally untrue, the bloke concerned hasn't been sentenced yet and is currently on remand - i.e. in prison. He'll go down for a long time. This is easy to check, his name is Mohammed Fahir Amaaz.
sorry i stand corrected Mr Amaad, who was given unconditional bail, shook his brother's hand before leaving the dock.which for me is scott free until sentencing which won't happen until April next year, when i bet its kept quiet and hope we all forget lest labour upset their massive vote base
Roger, this wasn't live on TV 3 minutes ago, it's a compilation of clips going back months. Prity poor commentary, I'm surprised you liked it.
but silent about the content , as i didn't make the vid i understand that its a montage of clips yet typical labour scouring for a shred of something to complain about, but not a word on over 20 vids you cannot dispute,im disappointed in you
Who was humiliated, all I’ve saw in the few seconds I managed was a screechy woman noone asking awkward questions … … he's a politician, do you really believe he gave it a second thought. If that’s evidence you need to post better clips tbh. Seriously, if you’ve really posted 20 videos, that no one watches, you need a hobby mate.
There are two of them, Mohammed Fahir Amaaz and Muhammed Amaad. Mohammed Fahir Amaaz is the one who has been found guilty of assaulting two coppers plus a member of the public and was remanded in custody awaiting sentencing (although he had a bail application on 26 August the result of which doesn't seem to be reported anywhere). The other one, Muhammed Amaad, is on bail, rightly so as he hasn't been found guilty of anything. The court hearing next year has nothing to do with sentencing. There is a third copper involved, who they are both accused of assaulting. The jury couldn't reach a verdict. So instead of just dropping the matter, the prosecution have gone for a retrial which will be in April. It seems the prosecution are determined to get the pair of them. I can't see anything the prosecution has done wrong. You can't bang people up until they have been found guilty. Exactly the same would have happened under the Tories or Reform. It's simply the English legal system. Starmer doesn't control who is prosecuted in Manchester, but even if he did, why on earth would any politician defend these two wasters? Politicians are continually wanting to be seen as tough on crime. It's not as if there aren't a massive amount of real reasons to attack the Labour Party that you need to try to twist the outcome of every court case to be Starmer's fault.
I've got one showing hobby, showing how the far left distort everything, and get upset when they really can't question the majority of material, showing them to be liars. So you complain of 1 video with a screechy voice but not Jess Phillips when the truth came out she knew all along about the grooming gangs, yet still voted against an inquiry, or all the backing for Rayner who took her own child's inheritance money from NHS, to pay a deposit on a love nest in Hove yet still had 2 other houses and the value of which shot up the next day after the deposit money was needed YOU REALLY NEED TO TAKE YOUR HEAD OUT OF THE SAND AND ADMIT CROOKED STARMER AND HIS CREW ARE THE WORST WE HAVE EVER HAD
He should have been remanded in custody until the retrial, the animal needs to be behind bars especially from the first video which is why the officers were sent there it is Starmers fault his 2 tier justice sentenced Lucy Connelly to 3 years for hurty words and these animals walk free for over a year , till the heat dies down
I wasn't complaining, simply saying whoever thought someone had been humiliated was deluded. You just jump from one clip to another and never actually make a point ... ... posting endless videos of nutjobs on TikTok and the rest of the internet isn't debate, it's a smokescreen of waffle.
