perhaps i should have wrote something more in line with your verb.................the words DOOM and GOOD BYE.........should suffice, tither ye not until thye end!
RIFC - Business matters.
- Thread starter Larry-AV
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
EDGE.
Official POTY 2011, 2014, 2015, 2018 & 2023
I'm hearing that tomorrow the ****s(board) will reject Dave Kings bid for an EGM on the grounds that they jist don't want to.
We will no like that. No sirree Boab.
We will no like that. No sirree Boab.
EGM confirmed for the 4th March.
http://www.londonstockexchange.com/...0B90T9Z75GBGBXASQ1&formName=frmRow&upToRow=-1
http://www.londonstockexchange.com/...0B90T9Z75GBGBXASQ1&formName=frmRow&upToRow=-1
I see the sneaky bastards are having it in London. You'd almost think they didn't want people to turn up and vote. 
EGM set for Wednesday, 4th March 2015, in London.
Dave King & Paul Murray - No way.
The 3 Bears - No objection to them joining the current Board.
Main website : Rangers FC - Requisitioned General Meeting
Investor website :
Rangers FC - Requisitioned General Meeting (RNS Number : 2959E) 06 February 2015
Dave King & Paul Murray - No way.
The 3 Bears - No objection to them joining the current Board.
Main website : Rangers FC - Requisitioned General Meeting
Investor website :
Rangers FC - Requisitioned General Meeting (RNS Number : 2959E) 06 February 2015
Ffs Larry the reason for the EGM is to try and get rid of the current board. We don't want anybody joining it. We want it gone.
Get with the programme man.
Get with the programme man.
This is in response to those who support the requisitioners.
Rangers' operating companies operate under UK Law, so there is no reason why the EGM should not be held in the UK capital, London.
However, this choice of venue is another example of the Board shooting itself in the foot, the main other one being the (proposed) naming rights to Ibrox ... there are probably others too, which folks might mention.
I have posted before saying that I regard the two factions as the devil and deep blue sea, although frying pan and fire could also apply.
I do not want to see Rangers go through more turmoil just to give Dave King and Paul Murray a blazer apiece. Better the devil(s) you know.
What I want to know is this : If the requisitioners win at the EGM, but Dave King and Paul Murray are then deemed to be 'not fit and proper persons' to become directors, what do those supporting the requisitioners expect Rangers (probably Gilligan, on his own on the Board) to do ?
If Dave King has received assurances that he will not be deemed to be 'not a fit and proper person', then he should make those assurances public, in the interests of transparency.
If Dave King has not received assurances, then it displays a Panglossian attitude on his part, with complete disregard to the interests of the Football Club.
Rangers' current problems stem from historical financial mismanagement and tax avoidance (EBTs, in dispute and Whyte - no dispute).
Dave King is a free man because the Law in South Africa allows payment of a fine in lieu of custody for non-payment of taxes. Do folks really want a man with his record 'on board' ?
Just in case : Panglossian is from Voltaire's book Candide, Dr Pangloss, a fantasist, who constantly believed that everything was for the best, in this, the best of all possible worlds.
Rangers' operating companies operate under UK Law, so there is no reason why the EGM should not be held in the UK capital, London.
However, this choice of venue is another example of the Board shooting itself in the foot, the main other one being the (proposed) naming rights to Ibrox ... there are probably others too, which folks might mention.
I have posted before saying that I regard the two factions as the devil and deep blue sea, although frying pan and fire could also apply.
I do not want to see Rangers go through more turmoil just to give Dave King and Paul Murray a blazer apiece. Better the devil(s) you know.
What I want to know is this : If the requisitioners win at the EGM, but Dave King and Paul Murray are then deemed to be 'not fit and proper persons' to become directors, what do those supporting the requisitioners expect Rangers (probably Gilligan, on his own on the Board) to do ?
If Dave King has received assurances that he will not be deemed to be 'not a fit and proper person', then he should make those assurances public, in the interests of transparency.
If Dave King has not received assurances, then it displays a Panglossian attitude on his part, with complete disregard to the interests of the Football Club.
Rangers' current problems stem from historical financial mismanagement and tax avoidance (EBTs, in dispute and Whyte - no dispute).
Dave King is a free man because the Law in South Africa allows payment of a fine in lieu of custody for non-payment of taxes. Do folks really want a man with his record 'on board' ?
Just in case : Panglossian is from Voltaire's book Candide, Dr Pangloss, a fantasist, who constantly believed that everything was for the best, in this, the best of all possible worlds.