the world cup is mildly interesting so far.
I think theres been few enough really high scoring ding dongs. Pakistan v Australia, south africa v sri lanka, Paksitan v sri lanka
England got 364 v bangladesh a week ago and a few other one sided games.
Is this a case of better bowling, more difficult conditions or just too many poor teams in the world cup who can't cope?
When I look at the 10 sides We see 3 contenders soon to be on 6 points and then Sri lanka feeling very sorry for themselves on 0 having batted well but conceded big and netherlands who shouldn't be there.
In reality Netherland, afghanistan and bangladesh are a bit of a joke and its like the rugby world cup. The fast WI couldn't even get here says it all about their implosion.
Having such a large single pool and then only semi finals seems silly to me. The worlds best will play for a full month but it'll boil down to a one off game middle of novemebr i na semi and then a one of final?
Surely you make this a shorter set of 4 seeded groups, let in a few more **** teams to make up the 16 and then have two legged QF, SF and a massive final.
I'd rather watch the top 8 of the world play off much earleir than be bored by a lot of these games. 200 to 250 odd scores is 4 and 5 and over territory.