Things to come out of the match.
1) why pick Anderson with questionable fitness
2) the top order
3) Moeen Ali, can't see why he's in the team
4) Bairstow, out of form with the bat and out of form behind the wicket.

Done........Woakes out.
Australia win by 251 runs having been 122-8 on the first day![]()
Sort of, They subbed him for fielding the entire match (aside from that first morning), often with someone who is a better fielder like Curran. And Anderson is very much a number 11 batsman and did still bat, nothing much lost.Lets take it into context. England played with 10 men for all but four overs of the match. Would be surprised to see Moeen in at Lords. Adil and Curran to come in for Ali and Jimmy
Sort of, They subbed him for fielding the entire match (aside from that first morning), often with someone who is a better fielder like Curran. And Anderson is very much a number 11 batsman and did still bat, nothing much lost.
The only thing they lost with him was his bowling, yet Australia played with only 4 recognised bowlers, the same as England ended up with. The difference was the quality, Lyon was far superior to Moeen and the seamers got far more out of the pitch than the English.
England's batting has been poor recently, they seem only to manage 1 innings per match. This could be because the focus has been on the one day format in order to win the World Cup in recent years.
Similar for the bowlers, first innings great, second they looked tired and uninspired.
Lets take it into context. England played with 10 men for all but four overs of the match. Would be surprised to see Moeen in at Lords. Adil and Curran to come in for Ali and Jimmy
Archer will be in the team. They can’t not play him after this performance. Curran is really unlucky to miss out. Interesting that woakes only bowled 7 overs despite being fit and England being one bowler doen
Could be carrying knocks, World Cup Wum was great. But being short for the Ashes is a mistake.
Archer/Curran and Adil to come in for me.
The hyperbolic media kneejerk has begun: "England have prioritised the white ball game and ignored test play"; "Australia are amazing, Lyon is the DBs," etc etc.
Imagine them writing the Aussie summary after day one: "What's happened to Aussie cricket? Swept aside in the World Cup semi-final by England and now humiliation awaits from the old enemy at 122 for 8 after just one day of an Ashes series. Woe, woe and thrice woe...Warner's confidence is shot...Lyon looking impotent in his first spell..."
Before the prioritising of the one day side, England were the #1 test team. Now we're #1 in ODI. Woe, woe and thrice woe. Since they were beaten 4-0 in Australia, their test record is 9 wins and 5 losses, including beating the #1 test side 4-1 just a year ago. This is hardly a classic Aussie side and they had some occasional performances on an easy wicket that could easily have come from an England player. England were still ahead after three days but the bowling attack was nobbled by day 4 and turn was predicted for day 5, when surprise of surprises, Lyon capitalised on it. Big woo.
Changes need to be made but with cool heads, not this rampant pessimism.
Anderson ruled out of 2nd test...............will we see him again in this Ashes series?