they are going at more than 6 already.yeah... but still need 6 an over minimum.
it's really about having wickets in hand to smash the lesser bowlers
they are going at more than 6 already.yeah... but still need 6 an over minimum.
it's really about having wickets in hand to smash the lesser bowlers
they are going at more than 6 already.

what i meant was Stokes & Morgan were going at more than 6 an over when i posted .Really don't see 350 since that is pretty much 12 an over.217 - 4 after 37 overs is less than 6 an over, but Stokes is still there and Butler's just come in. Someone needs to make a ton. We need 350 +![]()
what i meant was Stokes & Morgan were going at more than 6 an over when i posted .Really don't see 350 since that is pretty much 12 an over.
311 of the 50. I doubt that's enough.
no that's not even par.
going to lose and then the usual will start panicking and whining.
no that's not even par.
going to lose and then the usual will start panicking and whining.
oops
I never said I was going to be the one whining..... I was referring to the usual press suspects

No but you claimed it was below par and we were going to lose![]()
so?
less than 350 is not where you want to be these days. most sides are capable of chasing that.
If the pitch is decent. Fact is the pitch wasn’t a 350 pitch, 300 was above par based on the innings.