Retrospective punishment

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Anyways my point is if someone for eye gouging gets up to 2 years ban but on average 6 months so balotelli should be issued the same in my eyes what he done was very dangerous and if I done that in a public place I would be arrested for GBH with intent!
 
thats what i meant before lateboy, as it stands there is very little the FA can do, there is a standard 3 match ban to cover all incidents apart from other things like spitting, racism etc. depending on severity, these bans should be increased if needed..
 
If name calling can get Suarez an 8 game ban then Balloetti should be banned for a minimum of 12 months. Yes Suarez was being racist but seriously name calling (racist or not) and GBH are a world apart. Calling someone a racist name will not give them brain damage where as Balotelli may well have given Parker brain damage.
 
wasn't only cowardly it was reckless in the extreme, what if one of those studs actually tore into Scotty's neck, the longer the ban the better for this knob jockey
 
No news about Lescott's clearly deliberate elbow in the same game? Seems odd - Balotelli is acelebrit he'll get a ban, Lescott commits an offence which should have seen red and no mention is made. It's all down to where the media choose to focus their attention - that can't be right!!!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back