1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Retrospective inaction?

Discussion in 'Southampton' started by pass the football, Apr 15, 2013.

  1. TheSecondStain

    TheSecondStain Needs an early night

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2011
    Messages:
    39,383
    Likes Received:
    8,819
    There was an announcement about the non-interference rule as a consequence of the McManaman tackle. That's how I know about it. Perhaps you missed it..?

    Here PSF. I read the news on another website which talked about a change of ruling. Here it is termed an agreement and I guess the website I read it from may have misunderstood it as they were reacting very quickly. This is more considered: http://www.getreading.co.uk/sport/f...cmanamans_horror_tackle_went_unpunished_by_fa
     
    #21
  2. fatletiss

    fatletiss Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2011
    Messages:
    57,300
    Likes Received:
    40,066
    "Not to blame" as in they can't do anything on this occasion, however who writes the rules. Ultimately, they are to blame.
     
    #22
  3. hotbovril

    hotbovril Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    2,763
    Likes Received:
    1,624
    This is what is really wrong with football. So many things like this are so easy to put right but Twatter just spends his time between delivering stone-age soundbites and divvying out the FIFA cash to his family.

    EDIT: Two years signed up to this forum and I still don't know how to get an image/video on here correctly.
     

    Attached Files:

    #23

Share This Page