Retrospective inaction?

[TheSecondStain]

I checked when the McManaman incident occurred and the rule has not been changed as far as I could tell.

There was an announcement about the non-interference rule as a consequence of the McManaman tackle. That's how I know about it. Perhaps you missed it..?

Here PSF. I read the news on another website which talked about a change of ruling. Here it is termed an agreement and I guess the website I read it from may have misunderstood it as they were reacting very quickly. This is more considered: http://www.getreading.co.uk/sport/f...cmanamans_horror_tackle_went_unpunished_by_fa

 

[fatletiss]

The FA has no choice if Chris Foy or any of the officials saw it and took no action at the time. They can't do anything - the FA are not to blame here.

"Not to blame" as in they can't do anything on this occasion, however who writes the rules. Ultimately, they are to blame.

 

[hotbovril]

This is what is really wrong with football. So many things like this are so easy to put right but Twatter just spends his time between delivering stone-age soundbites and divvying out the FIFA cash to his family.

EDIT: Two years signed up to this forum and I still don't know how to get an image/video on here correctly.