Retitled: Return of the Django?

I'm glad you admitted that you ignored cernys posts which also means you ignored the vitriol and flaming posted by others towards Cerny. I'm positive northolt would of handled the situation better. Further you are bias, you don't act
independently and make decisions based on others influencing you.

Some posts made by cerny were clearly Misunderstood which resulted in further flaming from others.

No one on here signs up to rules you made they are only bound by the not606 terms.

Don't make things up as you go along.

 

Seriously Cerny, you need some kind of help

 

So this is the real Cerny...

[video=youtube;JfUM5xHUY4M]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JfUM5xHUY4M[/video]

 

Yeah, I laughed too. Blackie must've been pissing himself.

 

Cerny do you remember that bit when I said....... "Come on CB, you have a real chance to show us you were hard done by."

That actually was your cue to show us you were hard done by and some what bullied and victimised....BUT not to demonstrate to us that Brixton was a moderator "par excellence"....and had given you many more chances than you were entitled to

I for one was willing to give you a second chance...thinking that you were provoked (myself trying to forget your previous physical threats that had occured on an earlier thread to Bobmid?). Brixton thumbs up...you have done all you possibly can. I salute you
JermaineD/CB please give it a rest. I found you amusing...I do not any more

 

See what can happen when you're not paying attention - I go for med leave for two lousy ddays (and lousy they were) and Roller posts his article (excellent job in my opinion - enjoyed every bit of it), Northolt returns (yay), and we have CB allegedly back as well

 

I feel terrible - I didn't mention that Queenslander is back home

 

I'm all for free speech, but Cerny mate, you're overstepping the mark.

 

I apologize to Queenslander - should have mentioned his news as well

 

either calm down and stop being a prick or I will ban you

 

I act according to the expressed will of the members of this board. As I said above, if this was about me personally, you'd have gone months earlier.

The rules were written by me, based on the site's guidelines. They were then posted as a thread by Northolt for discussion by those around at the time. Only one person contested them - and this on the grounds that we'd be likely to use them inappropriately. Actually we rarely apply them at all. It was never our intention. They simply provided everyone (including me as a new mod at the time) with an idea of where the lines are to be used in extreme cases.

You sir are regarded by me as an extreme case: someone who is intent upon blowing the gaff. Not on my watch you won't.

Now, I'll say it again: convince us that you are here as part of a self-respecting group or have the courtesy to do the other thing. You have a few hours to think it over or you'll be looking for yet another user-name and/or IP address.

Can't say fairer than that.

 

Without wanting to sound like i've got my head well and truly up your backside Brix.........Thankyou. You sir are doing a fantastic job and i for one am very pleased you are our mod (As i think most, if not all, on here would agree)

 

I have a better idea. Let's see what others think. All you have proven in the above reply that you are a bias moderator.

Can't say fairer than that.....

 

I agree with Staines

 

lets not, closing thread and hope we get back to being sensible, if we cant I will back the mods and you will go.