Prediction League Results week 3

Great week from Vince..well done

Vince 16
Gordon 14
Nacho 13
Pops 13
Grimsby 9
Crumble 9
Flanders 9
Drum 8
Charlie 8
H & A 8
RAW 8
Rooch 8
Giacc 7
Gelders 7
Bri 7
Burley 6
Cumbrian 4
Gil 4
De six 3



League

Nacho 26pts
Vince 25
Pops 21
Gordon 20
Crumble 20
Grimsby 18
Gil 17
H & A 17
RAW 16
Gelders 16
Flanders 16
De Six 15
Drum 15
Charlie 14
Burley 12
Cumbrian 12
Rooch 11
Bri 10
Giacc 9
Vince 9
Bizarre 7
Farnboro 6
83 4

sorry about the format, I'll put in a table next week if 83 doesn't get back, just busy at work today.

​

 

Nice one mate thanks for taking the time.

 

Did I get none
Ok lads....Just until '83 returns.

I'll keep the same rules as he laid out on week one. First scorer (from either side) gets 5 extra points.

Sheffield Utd 1 v 1Barnsley

Aston Villa 1v 0Norwich

Bolton 1v 0Derby

Bristol City 2v 1Millwall

Fulham 2v 1Sheff Wed

Ipswich 2v 0Brentford

Forest 2v 1Boro

Preston 1v 0Reading

QPR 1v 1Hull

Wolves 1v 2Cardiff

Sunderland 2v 0Leeds Vaughn
I thought it was only first Sunderland scorer
Not opposing teams ?????????
Cheers

 

Err, I count 8 points for Nacho.

I don't know how people are getting such high scores on this but Nacho certainly did not get anywhere near to 17 points.

Here's nacho's predictions

Sheffield Utd v Barnsley 1-0 1-0 2 points.

Aston Villa v Norwich 2-0 4-2 1 points.

Bolton v Derby 1-2 1-2 2 points.

Bristol City v Millwall 3-3 0-0 1 point.

Fulham v Sheff Wed 1-1 0-1 0 points

Ipswich v Brentford 0-0 2-0 0points

Forest v Boro 1-3 2-1 0points

Preston v Reading 1-0 1-0 2points

QPR v Hull 2-2 2-1 0points

Wolves v Cardiff 3-1 1-2 0points

Sunderland v Leeds 2-1 Vaughan 0-2 0point

Can't be arsed to check everybody elses score but something clearly isn't right. Are some people getting 3 points for a win while others getting 2?
SAFC83's rules were clearly 1 point for a correct result 2 for correct score with 5 for correct 1st scorer in the sunderland game.

 

A thousand apologies Vince, corrected and amended.

Bri

I thought it was 2 points for result and extra point for the correct score. I'll check, as I said, been a busy day today.

 

Cheers

 

It doesn't say in addition anywhere but even if you did it that way the score is still wrong. He'd have 11 points.

 

This is what 83 had down as the rules, if it needs changing let me know..

"New game for the season. I'll be picking 10 games each week. Scoring similar to previous years but with a bonus on the Sunderland game every week.

2 points for guessing the correct match result.
1 point for guessing the correct score.
5 points for guessing the correct first goalscorer in the Sunderland game."

 

You're right about Nacho score....he had 13 points, i'll amend .....I need to do this when I'm less stressed at work lol..

 

Are FIFA running this league ?

It's as corrupt as f*ck !!

 

Yep I've read it mate. It doesn't make sense. Doesn't say in addition anywhere, looks like he got it the wrong way round to me. It's not clear,Look like he meant 1 point for correct result and 2 for a correct score but got it the other way round, as surely he'd just say 3 for a correct score?

It's is not written so anybody can achieve 3 points from a single prediction. Can we clear the rules up so they makes sense next round please fella. If it's 1 point correct result and 3 points correct score can it say it? Just makes it easier to check scores if there's absolute clarity.

 

don't worry, I got it wrong with 11!

 

So shall we make it 1 point for a result and an extra point for correct score? I'll just go with the flow to be honest

 

Don't mind how it's scored fella so long as it's clear. How did 83 score the 1st round? You could just redraft the rules as he scored the 1st round. I didn't even check the 1st round as I did ****.

if he scored 3 point for a correct score 2 point correct result, keep it the same and just word the rules each round as 3 points correct score and 2 point a correct result rather than 2+1 bonus way which I think over complicates the description.

 

Just leave it exactly as it is, Flanders, how '83 wanted it . . . . it doesn't say that the one point for getting the score correct is extra, but to me it's obvious, and the same as 'Pops had it last season

The only difference is the extra five points for the scorer, if I remember correctly.

 

**** off Gordon. Don't try and play 83 off against me. Will never work so don't be a snake. Nobody asked you anyway. I've ask for clarity. I would have done the same had it been 83, it's not a big deal, mind your own.

 

Ha ha . . . . I said that it's obvious to me, and it is - nothing sinister

 

Well ****ing done.

please log in to view this image

You didn't notice Nacho's scoring wasn't right which caused some confusion did you? when the score doesn't seem to add up on the rules stated. It's natural for people to question it. But you didn't noticed the inaccuracy did you? Bright spark. And nobody asked you.

 

No I didn't, Bri, 'cos I never check them, and nobody asked you either . . . . we're all entitled

Why do you need to be so abusive all of the time

 

Of course nobody asked me. I made the query

Why do I have to be abusive? Cause I'm more up front than the rats like yourself who litter the place with little subtle digs at people. Why are you such a snake with people?