So, Instagram exactly the same as twitter by the look of it. You post a picture and a comment and people respond to it. Tony, seek help, you are addicted to social media. Good news if it happens. He's not a number 10/'in the hole player' though, we still need a creative midfielder or 2 whatever formation we play.
3-5-2 seems to be back in vogue? -----------------------------Green--------------------------- ------------Onuoha-------Ferdinand------Caulker------------- Hoilett-------------------------------------------------Phillips ------------------Barton------------Faurlin------------------- ----------------------------Taarabt-------------------------- ---------------------Remy--------------Austin--------------- Bet DT would like that!!
Always said that Remy will be playing for us next season. He is a quality striker, but Arsenal, Tottenham? I don't think so. Him not getting any playing time for France was a blessing for little, old QPR. He preferred us to Newcastle, and the only other realistic competition in London is Palace and Wham. I can't see why we can't play 4411. Austin and Remy will get the goals that will keep us up (as long as we get Caulker and a couple more quality players to fill the weak spots). Can't wait for the Hull game!
Not having to outlay 8mil on a forward means we have the same amount to spend on a top class midfielder... This would mean we could boss more games rather than going in trying not to be overrun... Makes sense to me...
Cos he works bloody hard Dave that's why. He's far more mobile than BZ, BZ on the bench til the last 15 IMO.
Because as much as we like Bobby Z, he knows, we all know that he can best attribute by way of a late interchange .................. that way, we get all three into the game!
Eh? The £8m we'd have to splash out on a forward (if £8m is the right number) would come from proceeds from the sale of Remy, surely? On that basis, it's cost neutral whether Remy stays or goes. So, on that basis, it'd be the same net outlay for a new midfielder either way, wouldn't it?
Boy that is a gamble... I do not rate him that much Glad we are not paying How much did Charlie, Charlie cost
If we had spent that much it would be all over the headlines, mega rich Rss splashing the cash again.