I wasn't at the game last night ( I'm not doing a 100 mile trip for 'pointless' matches ). I have read the report - and it tells me a lot about what to expect this season.
Forget that we were 'dominant', and had much possession - it's what we didn't do with that possession ( even against lower league opposition ), that is a worry -- we didn't score [enough] ! - and our defending couldn't stop three goals by the [lower league] opposition.
We didn't score [enough] - because (a) we didn't create the opportunities, and (b) we weren't good enough to take the opportunities that were created. We conceded goals because - our defenders were not good enough [ even against lower league opposition ].
Both scenarios may improve when we use what Evans considers to be his starting 11......... but - when I saw the line-up, my initial thought was that everyone of them would have a reasonable claim for a first-team spot. On paper, it was a 'strong' 11 ( by Gills standard ). I appreciate that things did improve when subs were made with about 20 minutes to go - but - overall, it wasn't good enough [ even against lower league opposition. ]
I expect the defence to improve when Jones and Fuller resume their place. As for going forward - well - we may see some effort - but I suspect not enough end product [ especially against L1 opposition ]......... that could spell r e l e g a t i o n........................ whilst I don't think that we will be relegated this season ( there's only 2 places up for grabs ( apologies to Bury and Bolton ), it does mean that any aspiration of the play-offs is not realistic.
ps - can I apologise to gumpygit if any of the above contains even a morsel of sense - I tried hard to avoid it !
Forget that we were 'dominant', and had much possession - it's what we didn't do with that possession ( even against lower league opposition ), that is a worry -- we didn't score [enough] ! - and our defending couldn't stop three goals by the [lower league] opposition.
We didn't score [enough] - because (a) we didn't create the opportunities, and (b) we weren't good enough to take the opportunities that were created. We conceded goals because - our defenders were not good enough [ even against lower league opposition ].
Both scenarios may improve when we use what Evans considers to be his starting 11......... but - when I saw the line-up, my initial thought was that everyone of them would have a reasonable claim for a first-team spot. On paper, it was a 'strong' 11 ( by Gills standard ). I appreciate that things did improve when subs were made with about 20 minutes to go - but - overall, it wasn't good enough [ even against lower league opposition. ]
I expect the defence to improve when Jones and Fuller resume their place. As for going forward - well - we may see some effort - but I suspect not enough end product [ especially against L1 opposition ]......... that could spell r e l e g a t i o n........................ whilst I don't think that we will be relegated this season ( there's only 2 places up for grabs ( apologies to Bury and Bolton ), it does mean that any aspiration of the play-offs is not realistic.
ps - can I apologise to gumpygit if any of the above contains even a morsel of sense - I tried hard to avoid it !

after taking the lead. It's happened so MANY times since May 1999, I was beginning to think that we were cursed....... but then I remembered why it happens --- we have players whose skills levels are not good enough. It happens in Leagues 1 & 2. The posts above illustrates this fact -- and sadly, it will happen again ------ but------ does it have to happen so often? Are we under some sort of curse from Manchester City ?