1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Reither stamps on Januzaj's leg

Discussion in 'Manchester United' started by Carrick_16, Nov 2, 2013.

  1. Carrick_16

    Carrick_16 Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    4,498
    Likes Received:
    22
    The press are reporting that Reither could face a ban.
     
    #21
  2. Skylarker

    Skylarker PL High Commissioner

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2011
    Messages:
    49,428
    Likes Received:
    30,918
    Must be true then.
     
    #22
  3. Surlyc

    Surlyc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2011
    Messages:
    2,480
    Likes Received:
    457
    He was clearly going for the ball with the first kick. That's what you get for trying to lie on the ball when the opposition (Kasami) had already taken the ball away from you.

    That said, the stamp was clearly deliberate and Riether should get a ban. While the FA does have a long history of botching such decisions, I expect them to make an example of Riether since Fulham aren't a big club.
     
    #23
  4. Carrick_16

    Carrick_16 Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    4,498
    Likes Received:
    22
    bullsh!t.
     
    #24
  5. Skylarker

    Skylarker PL High Commissioner

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2011
    Messages:
    49,428
    Likes Received:
    30,918
    I just spoke to him. He said he was going for the ball with the first kick.
     
    #25
  6. UnitedinRed

    UnitedinRed Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2012
    Messages:
    25,308
    Likes Received:
    1,218
    Twitter said so meth. Do you dare question the mighty twitter, your god?
     
    #26
  7. Carrick_16

    Carrick_16 Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    4,498
    Likes Received:
    22
    f uck off comas.
     
    #27
  8. Carrick_16

    Carrick_16 Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    4,498
    Likes Received:
    22
    a pile of sh!t.
     
    #28
  9. Skylarker

    Skylarker PL High Commissioner

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2011
    Messages:
    49,428
    Likes Received:
    30,918
    I did.
     
    #29
  10. Carrick_16

    Carrick_16 Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    4,498
    Likes Received:
    22
    #30

  11. KingEric07.

    KingEric07. cape wearing twat

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2011
    Messages:
    8,788
    Likes Received:
    205
    #31
  12. Carrick_16

    Carrick_16 Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    4,498
    Likes Received:
    22
    BREAKING FA charge Fulham's Sascha Riether with violent conduct over Adnan Januzaj stamp.
     
    #32
  13. BBFs Unpopular View

    BBFs Unpopular View Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2013
    Messages:
    22,301
    Likes Received:
    1,658
    Aguero's antics, I don't know how the **** they let that go FFS, McManaman too. Then again you look at some of the other **** they've let go, they let Essien away with something awful at least once every season.

    the FA were recently ****ing of jacuzzi though. So maybe they'll charge Riether after all
     
    #33
  14. KingEric07.

    KingEric07. cape wearing twat

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2011
    Messages:
    8,788
    Likes Received:
    205
    They've charged him stating some new rule. I'd be ****ed off if I was a Fulham fan
     
    #34
  15. BBFs Unpopular View

    BBFs Unpopular View Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2013
    Messages:
    22,301
    Likes Received:
    1,658
    Some new rule<doh>

    Things is, from the video evidence they can hardly prove anything, how it looks doesn't mean **** all, but then again, they did Suarez on the word of a liar, met with him 3 times and coached him and then done Suarez and said he was an unreliable witness which is funny cos that's what they called Evra the last time he brought up racism claims against Chelsea's groundsman<doh>

    Not about who's guilty, just referring to the FA's complete bollocks way of doing things
     
    #35
  16. Carrick_16

    Carrick_16 Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    4,498
    Likes Received:
    22
    Moyes did not see the stamp by Riether on Saturday but has now watched the incident again on TV.
    'It&#8217;s a bad stamp and it does look deliberate,' he added. 'That&#8217;s for the referee to deal with or for people [the FA] to look at. We wont ask for protection. We are not saying that. Its up to the referees to do it right.


    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...-Sascha-Riether-charged-FA.html#ixzz2jhieHyYz
     
    #36
  17. HRH Custard VC

    HRH Custard VC National Car Park Attendant

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    28,219
    Likes Received:
    12,204
    I just emailed him, he said he plans to write a book about the incident
     
    #37
  18. Manobear

    Manobear I love cheeseburgers

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2011
    Messages:
    3,164
    Likes Received:
    44
    If I would have done it?

    OJ Simpsonesque, I would presume?
     
    #38
  19. HRH Custard VC

    HRH Custard VC National Car Park Attendant

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    28,219
    Likes Received:
    12,204
    Yes <laugh>
     
    #39
  20. Surlyc

    Surlyc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2011
    Messages:
    2,480
    Likes Received:
    457
    I stand by the fact that he is looking at the ball when he kicks, but at Januzaj when he stamps. That's fairly indicative of a change in target. There is absolutely no way to show he was trying to kick Januzaj before stamping on him. However, that's a little bit meaningless seeing as how he did clearly stamp on him immediately after...

    I think all Fulham fans were expecting the ban. Maybe it is annoying to be the first club caught with a new rule after many players got away with similar (and worse) things. However there is no doubt Riether deserves the ban: we only have a right to feel aggrieved if other players escape a retrospective three match ban for similar challenges in future.
     
    #40

Share This Page