A) We already have a ratings thread B) Your ratings are so ****ed up (how the **** did Lallana get a 9? ) that you shouldn't have bothered.
Lallana wasn't a 9 by any means but how some people are going on dispossession stats between Ramirez and Lallana can't have been watching. Lallana had men on him every time the ball went near him and still kept hold of it quite well. Ramirez only needs one player on him because he will either give it away or be tackled. You are bound to lose the ball more times when you are the main focus from the opposition.
Been out injured for 9 months but McQueen is back to training with the U21s. I think he could do this.
I certainly wouldn't give Chambers a 7. He didn't do enough for the first two goals. I realise he's still learning and is one of our future stars, but right now I need Clyne back in the team. and much as it pains me, lallana and Spider just weren't themselves. Kelv was the best Saint on the pitch by quite some margin.
Ramirez tried his best to get in between the Chelsea back 4 and Mikel, difficult job as Rodriguez didn't offer much help for him, Lallana tried hard showed some class when he left Cahill standing particularly, but in terms of chances created and overall showing thought Ramirez was the better performer. Whenever Shaw attacked he always ended up facing Azpilicueta, if one of our midfield could have burst forward they would have taken him out of the game, freeing up space for Shaw to run at Mata. As it was Shaw vs Azpili Luke didn't get the better of him once. Whereas Chambers although not as good defensively as Shaw offered something against the old legs of Cole admittedly. Thought K.Davis was our best player but the movement of Hazard/Oscar/Willian/Torres in the second half was for me a joy to watch. Got to appreciate the better team when you're well beaten.
