finding £50m for a brand new stadium that will hold value and be an asset for the club for decades > selling your car park to keep the lights on until the end of the season IMHO.
Rangers v Celtic
- Thread starter Ciaran
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
finding £50m for a brand new stadium that will hold value and be an asset for the club for decades > selling your car park to keep the lights on until the end of the season IMHO.
Yes your correct, my mistake.
It was 16 million six years ago
https://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/fp/sport/football/aberdeen-fc/399196/undefined-headline-677/
Yes your correct, my mistake.
It was 16 million six years ago
https://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/fp/sport/football/aberdeen-fc/399196/undefined-headline-677/
Still not Milne, mate.
Still millions of pounds of debt written off. Turned into shares no less.
Ironic eh!
Not really. Again, that debt was for stadium expansion. The DD stand and was a sustainable debt. Like a Mortgage. Just so happened that a couple off fans who have done well for themselves decided to gift the club. sort of like me paying off my sister's mortgage if I won the lottery. The club also still own this asset and it has huge value.
Rangers and losing Millions every year to the point that they are having to scrape together money to see out seasons. The are share releasing so often that the club is diluted. They are doing it to pay off Mexican alcoholics that are not assets.
So Aberdeen debt due to stadium improvements, good
Rangers debt due to stadium improvement, bad.
Tell me Chris do Rangers not still own their asset and does it not have huge value? They also have huge assets on the pitch. The midfield 3 who started for Aberdeen yesterday McGeouch, Ferguson, Ojo cost more than the Rangers midfield Airfield, Davis, Kamara. I think we can both agree that the Rangers three are worth far more than your lot.
Dinne let the facts get in the way of a good anti Rangers rant though eh.
So Aberdeen debt due to stadium improvements, good
Rangers debt due to stadium improvement, bad.
Tell me Chris do Rangers not still own their asset and does it not have huge value? They also have huge assets on the pitch. The midfield 3 who started for Aberdeen yesterday McGeouch, Ferguson, Ojo cost more than the Rangers midfield Airfield, Davis, Kamara. I think we can both agree that the Rangers three are worth far more than your lot.
Dinne let the facts get in the way of a good anti Rangers rant though eh.
Rangers losses are not due to Stadium improvements.
Davis is not an asset. He has zero resale value and costs the club money in a wage.
I would argue that Arfield will probably stay at Rangers for a good few more years and will not be sold for any considerable amount.
rogueleader
suave gringo
rogueleader
suave gringo
Part of Rangers losses are due to stadium improvements. Also improvements to the training facilities.
Davis is taking a wage! Well duh! He is also one of the best midfielders in the country. There's nothing to say Arfield will finish his career at Ibrox but he cost us nothing so...
Kamara cost 50 grand and is an International who is going to be playing in the European championships this summer. Ojo cost yoos more than double that fee and is...well I've not got an actual clue about him tbh. Ferguson may land you a million and half if he goes. McGeouch is worth zero.
Our improvements were building a new stand and then a new training centre. Your improvements were power washing years of muck off the side of the stands and painting a few rooms. They are not comparable.
Davis is brilliant. He's also at the very end of his career and will not be sold for money.
Kamara may earn you money...if people bid. But while you spend tens of Millions on players and then give them away because they are ****e and only recoup £1.9m windass etc, these are not assets. Pena alone cost your club more than our entire debt.
But aye. Rangers are well run.
Aberdeen's entire debt after building a state of the art training centre that will be an asset for years to come...£5m
Carlos Pena for Rangers...£2.2m initial outlay. 3 year contract at £1m a year. 12 appearances, many nights out pissed and a wiped nose on club shorts. Total...£5.2m
Yup Aldo, Rangers are better run and in a healthier place financially than Aberdeen.
Carlos Pena for Rangers...£2.2m initial outlay. 3 year contract at £1m a year. 12 appearances, many nights out pissed and a wiped nose on club shorts. Total...£5.2m
Yup Aldo, Rangers are better run and in a healthier place financially than Aberdeen.
Oh stop it. Rangers have had to spend millions on Ibrox. It was falling apart after years of neglect. It hasn't just had a makeover and the doors painted in a lovely shade of blue. But you know that. They also built a new stand at the training centre and gave that a total refurbishment as well.
Rangers are being run abysmally. Totally unsustainable but hammering them over the debt they have when your own club has even worse debt is pretty hypocritical my friend.
The "fans fighting fund" paid for that ****ty wee stand at the training centre.
I can't believe you just tried to use that. My school had a bigger ****ing stand.