Rangers v Celtic

.

 

You've posted one example which was probably due to an error. You cant explain how not one geologist from 135 countries who have examined the rocks has bothered to point out that the moon rocks are, indeed, not moon rocks.

I would like to think that at least one geologist out of at least 135 would be able to tell the difference.

 

But how do they know they are moon rocks ?

 

.

 

The way they were formed. Read the above post.

 

Care to explain why not one geologist from 135 countries has bothered to point out that the moon rocks are fake?

Or you can keep ignoring the point, of course.

 

Depends where they got them from imho

 

The wee shoap Doon Ra road ?

 

If they were moon rocks would they not be heavier that earth rocks and would the space ship not would plummet to earth real fast,asking for a friend?

 

.

 

Ignoring the evidence of 135 scientists because it doesn't fit in with yer mad conspiracy theories

 

.

 

.

 

I don't need to.

One would presume that if 135 geologists had studied the rocks and found them not to have come from the moon at least one them would have mentioned the fact.

Unless you think they're all involved in the conspiracy too? Getting damn complicated this money-making scheme from NASA.

 

.

 

at the thought of 135 geologists (at least) discovering that the moon rocks they've been handed are, in fact, pieces of petrified wood and not one of them deciding to mention that fact in any scientific paper, journal or online geology site.

 

I would have oor Eddie on my debating team any day of the week.

I like Eddie.

 

Eddie, do you know that if you hadn't Spunked all your money at the bookies, you could go out and bye a laser strong enough to bounce off man made objects on the moon in your own back garden?

 

.

 

Fact*