Rangers v Celtic

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
EDGE. said:
Ref makes honest subjective call vs Celtic
Celtic manager demands summit with SFA hierarchy and Gollum
Refs called to meeting
Told they must be 100% sure with any subjective call, otherwise give Celtic benefit of the doubt.

It’s actually been going on for years but us Rangers fans were just told to stop moaning, Celtic are just better etc.

Now the dross are getting up to Celtics calibre (ie they are still ****e but Celtic have gotten worse) and beginning to compete with them, the refs are the difference makers.

It’s mad how youse all know youse are ****, not one BHEAST I know thought they’d win the league, and in the space of 3 games, refs swung it Celtics way.

Now instead of it being moaning currant buns, the whole UK sees it.
Click to expand...

You must log in or register to see images
 
You must log in or register to see media

Apology letter incoming. That’ll cushion the blow for hearts
 
  • Like
Reactions: EDGE.
Toley Fart said:
You must log in or register to see media

Apology letter incoming. That’ll cushion the blow for hearts
Click to expand...
Yeah I didn't see much in it, thought it was stopped for the elbow smash on trusty, turns out the handball trumped it.

Can't video ref every moment but shouldn't elbow smash and handball either
 
Toley Fart said:
You must log in or register to see media

Apology letter incoming. That’ll cushion the blow for hearts
Click to expand...

Its actually one of the best examples you’ll see for explaining when VAR shouldn’t get involved using their own “clear and obvious” guideline.

We’ve all watched the replays numerous times and at no point in them can you pinpoint the moment when the ball hits the hand and actually be 100% sure about it, wheres the clear and obvious error? They basically re-reffed this whole passage of play, which they said they wouldn’t do, and still got it wrong.
 
Fabulous Fabio said:
Its actually one of the best examples you’ll see for explaining when VAR shouldn’t get involved using their own “clear and obvious” guideline.

We’ve all watched the replays numerous times and at no point in them can you pinpoint the moment when the ball hits the hand and actually be 100% sure about it, wheres the clear and obvious error? They basically re-reffed this whole passage of play, which they said they wouldn’t do, and still got it wrong.
Click to expand...
I agree.

I think they believed there was an attempted murder on Trusty and didn't see the handball at first.

The handball being caught was a byproduct of that dangerous challenge.

Lessons learned:

Don't elbow players.

Don't hand ball
 
Mind The Duck said:
I agree.

I think they believed there was an attempted murder on Trusty and didn't see the handball at first.

The handball being caught was a byproduct of that dangerous challenge.

Lessons learned:

Don't elbow players.

Don't hand ball
Click to expand...

It’s a contact sport, these sort of coming togethers happen, the Motherwell boy was already up meeting the ball when Trusty jumped into him.

You are the only team I know of to get a penalty for a clash of heads, now you want them for players coming together going for a header.
 
Fabulous Fabio said:
It’s a contact sport, these sort of coming togethers happen, the Motherwell boy was already up meeting the ball when Trusty jumped into him.

You are the only team I know of to get a penalty for a clash of heads, now you want them for players coming together going for a header.
Click to expand...
I'm happy to get them for a blatant hand ball
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back