Scottish football is ****ed with or without Celtic because of what rangers <rip> did to it. It was on a shoogly peg before the debacle and now, final nail. I hope Celtic serve their 2 year notice and piss off elsewhere. There's not a corrupt an institution as the SFL. Punished enough? Pffft.
Here's a question for you ****s that know this sort of **** If a normal company went bust and the owner of the company started up a new one the next day with a similar name, the same staff and in the same building, would he need to take on the debts of his old company?
Rangers starting all over again as an entirely new club is not a punishment. It is just some **** that was always going to happen when your club ceased to exist. There is no basis to apply a transfer um-bungo on that new club. Therefore I do not agree with that sanction. I do think that getting the transfer of share from Rangers is extremely unfair on clubs who actually merit taking up that share and meet the criteria to do so. However for the benefit of the game on the assumption that there will be a not insignificant transference of allegiance from Rangers to Sevco I would be prepared to forego any sanction to allow Sevco to make that transfer. I would like there to be a more fluid relegation/promotion structure throughout the Scottish game to placate clubs like Spartans. That is not an unreasonable position to take. I genuinely scoff at the guff that it is vindictive of people to want to punish Rangers. They were absolutely ****ing rotten and any vindictiveness lot is absolutely merited if that is how people feel. I ****ing hated Rangers but they are gone now. Sevco will never be anywhere near Celtic so i am not looking to keep them down. They can do whatever the **** they want but for the reasons I outlined above, the transfer ban should not be the price of the share transfer.
I'm gonna read that again tomorrow and hopefully give you a big thumbs up for it. Am too beelin' tonight to be reasonable.
I wonder what the SFL clubs will make of this as the SFA is effectively trying to fast track rangers back into the SPL? Integrity?
Is there not a rule in div 3 , you can only have 22 players in your squad , with youths included have Rangers not got a squad of over 30 , will they not have to sell to buy ?????
In the last two days I've seen the chairmen of Brechin, East Fife and Peterhead (Rangers first 3 opponents) on SSN talking about playing Rangers and they were all delighted. Especially the East Fife chairman who'll be getting a cut of the gate money at Ibrox. It's only 3 out of about 30 but why wouldn't they be pleased about making more money?
Spare a thought for STD. He's confused as he desperately tries to give up cock and become normalised.