Rangers get let off again

The imposition of conditions relating to transfer of membership was made on the basis that the Scottish FA, as the governing body, has an obligation to protect the integrity of the national game and to ensure that all member clubs operate within the articles of association.

How is this protecting the integrity of the game? From now on we should only accept player suspensions after they leave the club.

 

Get these ****ing tarriers telt UN

 

Christ, enough already! I've enjoyed watching old Rangers/new Rangers getting battered from pillar to post as much as the next Celtic fan but it's time to draw a line in the sand.

Despite the bravado, it's an utter humiliation for Rangers fans to find their club playing in the 3rd division. They may not like to admit it but wait until they've played a few games against the likes of East Stirling, Peterhead et al. and the novelty will soon wear off.

There's no good can come from continuing to punish them further.

The sooner the football proper kicks off, the better.

 

Have a look on Sevco's board

Also, punished enough? they had a 10 point deduction for administration as per the rules. No other punishment has been administered.

They've been liquidated. Sevco's a brand new team and shouldn't even be near the SFL.

You're doing hun talk there, ST. Give yourself a shake.

 

So its okay for the SFA to bend their rules because its rangers? Nothing changes rangers will have players on the pitch that they shouldn't have and the SFA let them.

 

Scottish football cannot afford to chase away 50,000+ supporters Tina. Do you honestly think the likes of Gala Fairydean or Spartans are going to bring to Scottish football what Rangers can?

Also, I've looked at the new Hun board and it looks like the drink-addled BH is off on one as per. No surprise there considering he believes he beat the IRA single-handedly back in the 1970s when he was still in short breeks.

 

Yes. And don't kid yourself on that they wouldn't do the same if it was us in that position.

 

Stop talking sense ya ****

If you're gonny start that talking sense ****e then you're no welcome here

 

Naw read the older posts fae earlier today some of them are funny as ****

 

How can a liquidated club bring anything

Any bastard child of theirs should be brought in with sanctions worse than a transfer ban that isn't really effective, given the dates quoted.

As long as they agree to abide by the rules and sanctions re the dual contracts.

Also, the small matter of HMRC'S bill.

Can't have the good without the bad

 

And you, aye you. You've already been told about the rules and who breaking them. I educated you only a matter of minutes ago, don't be spouting the same ****e to other people

 

Really so why after the shame game was Lennon the only one to receive punishment? Or dougie dougie gate? Jim Farry? This is allowed to happen because of the rangers minded people at the SFA (Campbell Ogilvie).

 

Rangers may have been liquidated but the new club is still Rangers, regardless of what anyone says. They bring more fans than probably all the clubs in the 3rd, 2nd and 1st divisions put together.

What more do you want to happen to them? They're in the 3rd division, they've lost almost all of their best players and they're about to get a one year transfer embargo.

By continuing to hammer them there's a real danger of cutting off your nose to spite your face.

 

Timmy is raging UN, they will force ST to the light side if they keep this up.

 

And you reckon if Celtic had been in a similar predicament, they'd get the same 'haun up'? Not a chance.

It appears it pays to bend rules/shaft the tax man

. I hope every other team in Scotland realises this.

Sevco fans wear their shame like a badge of honour.

 

As I've said, anything more the SFA do is meaningless. Is Rangers starting over again in the 3rd division not enough punishment? ST is the only one on here talking any real sense and understanding the implications for Scottish football if what Celtic fans want was to actually happen

 

I can see the argument for waiving the 3 years audited accounts rule. As it would be stupid to deny them entry on that basis as they would bring in a lot of revenue.

I don't see why they should get of with punishments though if they claim to be the old rangers. Its not the SFA fault that rangers have a weaken squad.