Ramirez injury

fran-MLs little camera

fran-MLs little camera

Well-Known Member
Feb 18, 2011
69,538
24,934
113
newport, isle of wight
Adkins and the OS have finally made a statement about Ramirez. I gather he might be injured! I may be overthinking this, but I reckon he could be back sooner than they are saying. Adkins said 6 weeks if stated by the medical department must be from time of injury. Then said he won't be available Saturday....strange thing to say if you reckon he's out for a further 4 weeks. Probably just being hopeful by reading between the lines...what do you think?
 
Get well soon Rambo, we could do with the boost that you will provide, hope the rest of the team raise their own efforts to make up for his absence.
 
Jose Fonte baby said:
Someone said on the West Ham thread that he was back in light training?
Click to expand...

They're mixing Clyne's dead leg with Ramirez's. Nat has been in training and might be available for WHU. Ramirez looks as though he might go the full 6 weeks, which means another month although, as mentioned above, he's showing good signs of recovery.

Chung might be fit in a week and I'm looking forward to seeing his speed and skill again.
 
fran-MLs little camera said:
Tadanari had an injured arm...surely once that's healed, you recover quicker than from a leg injury because you have been able to keep some fitness up?
Click to expand...

Yeah, I think it's getting OK. Adkins reckons he'll be in the line up for Leeds in the League Cup.

Tadanari is close – he's been joining in training a bit more, so we'd like to think that he'll be in a better position by the end of next week.

I don't really need to tell you this Fran, as you frequent the OS. :smile:
 
Joe Steinberg said:
"He's showing good signs of recovery", says Adkins.
Click to expand...

Point being it's not easy to put a fixed amount of time on something like a muscular injury, because human beings are different and heal differently, and it takes time to see how they are recovering. So saying Monday 19th November is not particularly meaningful.
 
fran-MLs little camera said:
When asked in an interview (on Player), Adkins briefly had that wicked look he sported when we were signing Ramirez. Still wouldn't be surprised to see him back earlier than the 4 weeks quoted.
Click to expand...

Yes, I agree with you on that, didn't look devastated at a 6 week absence did he! Although I know its not Adkins style to winge or show remorse over things. Very much a get on with it sort of bloke. Would be delighted obviously if Gaston returns early.
 
We did well without Ramirez against City and United, so can we continue in that same vain, please?
 
Just took the following off saintsweb, hope it's not true:-

"I was told today that he was light training but has suffered a relapse (swelling) so recovery put back. Presumably nobody knows anything as there is nothing on here?"
 
Downthe36 said:
Just took the following off saintsweb, hope it's not true:-

"I was told today that he was light training but has suffered a relapse (swelling) so recovery put back. Presumably nobody knows anything as there is nothing on here?"
Click to expand...

That was always a possibilty if they rushed it, just a set back at worse I would think, they are no mugs when it comes to dealing with this kind of thing, the fact that he is there at all is positive. As I understood from the minimal information received he would not be back until December. We just have to accept that, anything earlier would be a bonus.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back