That's what it's been like for most of the show. They should be talking about future of Rangers and what it means for the club rather than just going over this pish.
I canny listen to any more of their ****e. They call themselves reporters? They should be shot with a ball of their own ****e.
We couldn't all get into Europe through the backdoor You're going on one season though, what about all the rest?
As I mentioned in another thread, you do know that Scotland's co-efficient was higher during both Rangers doldrum years in the 80's (Wasn't really a proper co-efficient then mind you) and Celtic's in the 90's than it was until both teams had good runs in the late 2000's, and higher than today? All this pish about one team dominating a league, with no competition affecting attendances and performance in Europe. So how did the likes of Rosenborg, Olympique Lyonnais, Porto, etc manage to improve both while dominating domestically?
47. Glasgow Rangers Sco 22.0500 0.3750 6.5332 12.7200 2.0500 Total - 43.728 61. Celtic Sco 12.0500 7.3750 5.5332 2.2200 5.5500 Total - 32.728 The numbers speak for themselves
are these ****s forgetting that celtic have about 3 billionaires behind them and that the club are one of the most financially sound in europe the tv money is peanuts, who gives a **** if we lose it, we have a worldwide fanbase to compete with any club in the world and it wont be greatly missed dont delude yersel ya hun ****s, we will be better off without you goodnight
