Match Day Thread QPR vs Rotherham United

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

daverangers

Well-Known Member
Jun 30, 2011
9,072
9,059
113
Paris
You must log in or register to see images


QPR vs Rotherham
The Championship
Tuesday 24th November 2020 - 19h00
Kiyan Prince Foundation Stadium

You must log in or register to see images

Previous meetings;
Only played them 18 times before, so not many.
Games won: 7
Games drawn: 5
Games lost: 6

Ones to remember;

06 Jan 1968 Queens Park Rangers v Rotherham United W 6-0 League Division Two
19 Mar 1983 Queens Park Rangers v Rotherham United W 4-0 League Division Two
16 Jan 2016 Rotherham United v Queens Park Rangers W 0-3 League Championship
18 Mar 2017 Queens Park Rangers v Rotherham United W 5-1 League Championship

Ones to forget;
10 Nov 1951 Queens Park Rangers v Rotherham United L 2-3 League Division Two
29 Mar 1952 Rotherham United v Queens Park Rangers L 1-0 League Division Two
10 Dec 2016 Rotherham United v Queens Park Rangers L 1-0 League Championship
13 Mar 2019 Queens Park Rangers v Rotherham United L 1-2 League Championship

Players who have played for both;
Dexter Blackstock;

2006–2009 Queens Park Rangers 109 (30)
2016–2017 Rotherham United 16 (1)

Ryan Manning;

2015–2020 Queens Park Rangers 87 (7)
2018–2019 → Rotherham United (loan) 18 (4)

Dominic Ball;

2016–2019 Rotherham United 13 (0)
2019– Queens Park Rangers 39 (2)

Match Preview;
Our visitors to this early evening game (don't be caught out by the 7pm kick off!) are Rotherham, who were beaten at the weekend, 1-0 at Swansea. That loss leaves them one place, and 2 points behind us, in 19th place. Their joint top scorers this season are Crooks, Barlaser and Lindsay, with 2 goals each.

I was encouraged by all but the first few minutes on Saturday. We played some nice football, and deserved a draw which without the lapse of concentration in the opening minutes, could have been a win. Going into Tuesday night, I have glanced at the table and there is an opportunity, with a win, to potentially move up to 10th (even 9th with a win and big swing in the goal difference). It is certainly a chance to get three points that will move us further towards the solid mid-table pack, and stop us from having to keep an eye over our shoulders at the lower end of the table.

I'll add team news tomorrow/Tuesday, but wanted to get the thread up before the week started, and give you all time to point out obscure players from the 1930's, 40's, 50's etc...who have played for both.

 
Good luck tomorrow. You should win this. We played them in the first game of the season and after controlling the game for 90 mins, they nicked it in injury time. Our goalie had nothing to do all the game, except pick the ball from the back of the net. I had them down as a relegation team based on their performance that day. We are 4 points below them because of that loss so it would be a big help to us (little Wycombe) if you get all 3 points <cheers>
 
Obviously no fans travelling to the game...but why is kick off at 7pm? Still means lots of people (myself included) will still be at work for most of the first half. Is it just a more convenient time for the players/staff?

Also, still no team news on the official site...anyone know of any injuries/suspensions?
 
It's up to you Jeff for the pictures
I have been sent to Christchurch by work for three days and they told me to keep all my receipts so I am currently drinking guinness in an Irish bar in riccerton and won't be able to post em

Some great bars in Christchurch if I remember well....enjoy <cheers>
 
  • Like
Reactions: Didley Squat
Good work as usual Dave.
Agree with others in that these are the games you expect to win and they turn you over. Let's hope we are wrong.