Pusic Signs

[tiger_totty]

I think he may have picked up an injury, he was with the team in Ipswich, as i saw him at the services, when the team stopped on the way back home and he looked like he was limping.
If he isnt injured why didnt he at least make the bench last night!!

 

[PLT]

I think he may have picked up an injury, he was with the team in Ipswich, as i saw him at the services, when the team stopped on the way back home and he looked like he was limping.
If he isnt injured why didnt he at least make the bench last night!!

Simpson didn't either.

It's probably because he hardly touched the ball against Macclesfield and has done nothing in training to prove to NP that he should be playing league games.

 

[TONY_WARNERS_FACE.]

Simpson didn't either.

It's probably because he hardly touched the ball against Macclesfield and has done nothing in training to prove to NP that he should be playing league games.

But yet still did enough for him get a contract.

Classic Nige.

 

[PLT]

But yet still did enough for him get a contract.

Classic Nige.

So we should just have 16 players under contract at any one time then?

 

[TONY_WARNERS_FACE.]

So we should just have 16 players under contract at any one time then?

No, but you'd expect a new signing to make it into the team wouldn't you? Otherwise what's the point in signing him?

 

[PLT]

No, but you'd expect a new signing to make it into the team wouldn't you? Otherwise what's the point in signing him?

We need more players in the squad than just the 16 who played last night, at the moment Pusic is one of those players. If we didn't have him we'd have less cover, isn't that obvious?

We needed an extra winger for cover, we got one. So far we haven't had an injury on the wing so he hasn't been needed but he will be at some point. I don't see the problem with that scenario.

 

[TONY_WARNERS_FACE.]

Just seems strange we had our left back there yesterday when we'd just signed a winger.