Agree, that the Carroll deal as a bloody good sale, but come on!!! What's the point in selling our best players if we don't invest ONE PENNY in any new players, and instead make a profit of 600K! It's not all doom and gloom, but we needed a striker before carroll, and replacing him with an injury prone, inexperienced player with half a season of EPL experience doesn't cut it for me. If Ashley wanted to show ambition, he would have bought a quality, proven goalscorer. If you can't see how badly we are missing one, there must be something wrong with you!
(sorry to post after post, but i need to reply to this)
The problem here is that the owners of NUFC do not see a signing as the first outlay. That is to say that a player costs more than the transfer fee.
For example Cabeye costs the transfer fee *plus* his wages for the contract *plus* extra costs.
Now, this might mean we have less to spend. But it does mean that the day of Fat Freddy Shepard hiding the real cost of players in dodgy dealing are gone. The Carroll money, as far as I am concerned *has* been spent. But not on transfer fees, it has been spent on PLAYERS. (And good payers, as far as I am concerned)
This is no bad thing. You might say i'm an idiot, you might say i'm an ostrich with my head in the sand...
But in the future i'll still be supporting NUFC, and if we carry on this way, i'll be supporting a club with a sensible financial model that means the club won't collapse like a Leeds, Portsmouth, Plymouth... (Liverpool, Man Utd, Man CIty; when their owners get bored and leave?)
There are not many of us about. I assume he was not a local!

