This isn't going to help sock theories.
And Sucky's betterJust stick to Sucky, standard Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde
@duggie2000 will agree there.And Sucky's better
I’m doing the league table for 1988/89 season.
1) A Villa
2) Norwich
3) Liverpool
4) Coventry
5) Spurs
6) Sheff Wed
7) Wimbledon
8) Arsenal
9) Middlesbrough
10) Southampton
11) Charlton
12) Everton
13) West Ham
14) Man Utd
15) Millwall
16) Forest
17) Luton
18) Derby
19) Newcastle
20) QPR



Okay I’ll do it properly. I’m a bit concerned about everyone’s confidence about where we are going to finish
1) Liverpool
2) Man City
3) Arsenal
4) Chelsea
5) Man Utd
6) Brighton
7) Villa
8) Newcastle
9) Spurs
10) Bournemouth
11) Fulham
12) Everton
13) Forest
14) Palace
15) West Ham
16) Sunderland
17) Leeds
18) Wolves
19) Brentford
20) Burnley
That’s fair enough. I agree some have been weakened and it should be more competitive down the bottom than previous seasons.The game aside ... I agree with your concern... clubs that have come up and make wholesale changes often find it difficult ... Fulham a few years ago were a classic example ...
... and the gulf between those coming up and those already there is bigger than ever...
... but I do believe that the promoted clubs have a better chance of survival this season than last - not only were the 3 that went straight back down very poor... the clubs they had to 'aim at' just had much more quality than them ...
... but what has happened at Wolves and particularly Brentford leaves them vulnerable IMHO ...they are much weakened by this summers transfer business...
That’s fair enough. I agree some have been weakened and it should be more competitive down the bottom than previous seasons.
I do think ourselves and Leeds are making good signings and really improving our squads maybe more than the teams who have been promoted in previous seasons.
We still have time to sort our defence out because the CB position looks really weak. If we haven’t brought in any for the West Ham game and are thumped it could be a blessing in disguise because it will then push the club into paying whatever for the quality that we need in there.

Fosse I will try and do mine properly sometime tonight.
That weekly idea sounds great, but maybe too much work for you.

You can’t possibly be right mate as there was no top flight football then, Fosse to confirm.I’m doing the league table for 1988/89 season.
1) A Villa
2) Norwich
3) Liverpool
4) Coventry
5) Spurs
6) Sheff Wed
7) Wimbledon
8) Arsenal
9) Middlesbrough
10) Southampton
11) Charlton
12) Everton
13) West Ham
14) Man Utd
15) Millwall
16) Forest
17) Luton
18) Derby
19) Newcastle
20) QPR
You can’t possibly be right mate as there was no top flight football then, Fosse to confirm.
Probably about the same. My mates dad used to take us to Stamford bridge to see Chelsea. Also went to the FA cup final in 71 as my cousin was a huge Arsenal fan and to top It all went to the 1977 European cup final at Wembley with my step dad who was a huge Liverpool fan. He won the tickets in some kind of work raffle. Not sure I recognised the importance of the game but first time at Wembley. Not bad for a 12 year old…satisfied?My first time watching top flight English football live was 1971/72... yours?
Probably about the same. My mates dad used to take us to Stamford bridge to see Chelsea. Also went to the FA cup final in 71 as my cousin was a huge Arsenal fan and to top It all went to the 1977 European cup final at Wembley with my step dad who was a huge Liverpool fan. He won the tickets in some kind of work raffle. Not sure I recognised the importance of the game but first time at Wembley. Not bad for a 12 year old…satisfied?
If the none Prem fans vacated the board it would be rather diminished season by season ...
Just put me on ignore, I won't miss you ... promise...
I don't do that.I ain't gay you put me on ignore
I don't do that.
I make others do that bro.
You must log in or register to see images