I was under the impression Beastiality was performing unspeakable acts on animals, nothing to do with being a paedophile.
Ahh,here come the put down's, sound mate and it's about time you accepted Rix sexually assaulted a child no matter what the definition of his crime instead of being a smartarse "lad". Trying to score brownie points instead of castigating him from the time it took you to reply to my first post on the thread speaks volumes "lad".
The simple fact is, if he had sex with someone under the legal age, then he is, by legal definition, a paedophile.
Ok,lets both take a step back. You first pulled me earlier in the thread when i nominated him for the OP's XI, what the **** does it matter what the legal term for his crime is?, i told you that as far as i'm concerned he qualifies because of his crime. So why do you feel the need to take offence that i got his legal criminal description wrong?, he is what he is a beast​!
Kop I've taken no offence whatsoever and I agree he's a ****ing dog. But it just grinds with me that certain words, I.E Paedophile, Racist etc are thrown with no thought.
Ok Ra,fair enough. Btw iv'e been reading(and posting tonight)on the Ferdinand thread on the manc board so i can see where your coming from with racism. But we both have the same view on Rix but differ on a description of his crime, lets move on "lad".