That's.better than trents effort at it. Nothing wrong with that style, Yes he looks like a young red dwarf character
I actually think he suits the style although he's about two years too late catching it up. It's not the best style to stay fresh looking after you've slept on it for a more than a week though.
I'm less interested in delle alli's hair as I am in the fact his career went from courting real and PSG to the spurs reserves. It will be interesting to see if nuno gets a tune out of him. the 433 employed in the first game resulting in a win v city without romero, doherty, gil or kane and with siissoko and winks on the bench. spurs are in a lot better position than arsenal are for a bounce back to the top 4. If the manager can get a tune out of the resources to hand. I'd be selling kane pronto though.
very interesting. i see some fake covid story being sent about to excuse him. apparently his holiday took him through florida so that's all fine then. A 2 week fine would sort that out in any other player's life if they missed 2 weeks of training (not one) and an important match they were payed 200k to not play in (yet he could go to the ground for despite "isolating") if they bend over any more for him they can smack his backside while he rides them anally.
lols another year doesn't he know mbappe will be free and haaland will be 75mil? who would buy a slowing up, drooling imbecile with bad ankles who will be 29 and cost 150mil when they can have the young and exciting striking talents.
A poll on how happy fans are with their clubs owners... ... where the **** did they find the 3.1% that like Mike Ashley?
Who are the 5% not happy with Leicester owners?! Still makes me laugh United fans about glazers. Just given united over £100m To spend on sancho and varane. 75m last season 200m season before 75m season before… 170m season before… but boo the glazers who only ever take Money out the club.
TBF, the 3.1% that like Mike Ashley could just be Sunderland fans hijacking the voting. Similar for Leicester but could be a few clubs for them.
I'm surprised by ours. I would have expected that % before the super league stuff but not after. Our fans have been roughly 50/50 since we've had these owners but trust in them has dropped significantly with both the breakaway schemes.
You think it would be lower or higher? I think it’s about right. Think lot of people are happy with them and what they’ve done, bringing in right manager, backing him with some money, doing work on the ground, increasing revenues making us self sufficient. but then others who want them to invest more and are disappointed by the ticket price rise, the ESL stuff etc. I think overall I’m happy. Am I 100% happy, no for reasons above but I’d rather them than probably 90% of other owners in the prem.
The only thing they have "given" us is a half billion pound debt. Any players bought are from club earnings and nothing else.
The debt, lack of any contact, no interest in the club other than profits (if we finished 17th every year and made them the same money they would be content), having no idea if Woodward was any good at his job or even caring. Can you see anything good about them?
Only that their method has allowed you to keep up a reasonable parity with the sugar-daddy clubs in the recruitment department. I can't say I like the way they do it, but then I'm no financial expert. There's no doubt they're only in it for the money, but if that also brings the club success doesn't that justify it? Personally I don't like the way any of our big clubs are owned these days. I'd like for owners to have some sort of attachment to the club rather than just see it as a cash-cow, but that might be a bit naive in the modern world. The big danger it seems to me for Utd is that too long a period without success (relatively speaking) could reduce the revenue streams to the point where the debt can't be serviced. They're spending a lot of money trying to keep up with clubs that have a different financial structure. Do you think there's a serious danger of it all going tits up?
Take your own owners and ours in the same snapshot of what they have done infrastructure wise. Ours have done the sum total of **** all to our ground, yours have built a new stand and put the debt on the club (loan from FSG). Neither had any reason to do this if they gave a ****, infrastructure has no impact on FFP at all so if they cared about their "investments" they would keep them in good condition by improving them from their own pocket. ENIC have just played the same game with Spurs, here's a lovely new ground and we got you good interest rates to pay for it. By the way, we will be taking our share of profits from any NFL, Concerts or Boxing etc you may host.
