Roy's now got quote rage ...
Sucky just impotent splutterings
You must log in or register to see images
Prem Hall of fame
- Thread starter Sucky
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
You 3 girls are a constant source of amusement, as well as being the easiest wind ups on the forum ...
Got Sucky telling us that International achievements can't be counted towards inclusion in the Prem Hall of Fame .. fair enough, I agree, it should be based on Premier League acheivement by definition ... so FA Cup and Champions League acheivement must also be out? ... so on that we can now all agree ... so Slippy Gee gets into the Hall of Fame for beiing in a team that once ran Citeh close ... classic
Munse says it shouldn't be based on trophies, ergo then, not winning the Prem .. so what the **** should it be based on... appearances? .. so if Gareth Barry is not in there, why not? ... if that's the criteria he has just as much right as Slippy Gee, surely? ... so what about Alan Shearer? ... only success in Premiership terms came from being the most expensively assembled outfit at that time when Uncle Jack Walker's successfully bought the Premier League ... the blueprint that Citeh, Chelski and Liverpool then followed ... if Shearer was really that good, why did he achieve **** all with Saints and Newcastle? ...
Yet Munse, Sucky and Squelchy all throw their toys put of the pram at the thought that players who have actually achieved Premier League success without the benefit of that humungous financial backing could ever be considered for the Hall of Fame ... priceless ... the 3 Stooges in overdrive ... no wonder everybody laughs at the numpties eh?
You 3 girls are a constant source of amusement, as well as being the easiest wind ups on the forum ...
Got Sucky telling us that International achievements can't be counted towards inclusion in the Prem Hall of Fame .. fair enough, I agree, it should be based on Premier League acheivement by definition ... so FA Cup and Champions League acheivement must also be out? ... so on that we can now all agree ... so Slippy Gee gets into the Hall of Fame for beiing in a team that once ran Citeh close ... classic
Munse says it shouldn't be based on trophies, ergo then, not winning the Prem .. so what the **** should it be based on... appearances? .. so if Gareth Barry is not in there, why not? ... if that's the criteria he has just as much right as Slippy Gee, surely? ... so what about Alan Shearer? ... only success in Premiership terms came from being the most expensively assembled outfit at that time when Uncle Jack Walker's successfully bought the Premier League ... the blueprint that Citeh, Chelski and Liverpool then followed ... if Shearer was really that good, why did he achieve **** all with Saints and Newcastle? ...
Yet Munse, Sucky and Squelchy all throw their toys put of the pram at the thought that players who have actually achieved Premier League success without the benefit of that humungous financial backing could ever be considered for the Hall of Fame ... priceless ... the 3 Stooges in overdrive ... no wonder everybody laughs at the numpties eh?
Jesus
Yeah. i know ye dont know much beyond the tyne my friend. But ye dont drop people from hall of fames.
You 3 girls are a constant source of amusement, as well as being the easiest wind ups on the forum ...
Got Sucky telling us that International achievements can't be counted towards inclusion in the Prem Hall of Fame .. fair enough, I agree, it should be based on Premier League acheivement by definition ... so FA Cup and Champions League acheivement must also be out? ... so on that we can now all agree ... so Slippy Gee gets into the Hall of Fame for beiing in a team that once ran Citeh close ... classic
Munse says it shouldn't be based on trophies, ergo then, not winning the Prem .. so what the **** should it be based on... appearances? .. so if Gareth Barry is not in there, why not? ... if that's the criteria he has just as much right as Slippy Gee, surely? ... so what about Alan Shearer? ... only success in Premiership terms came from being the most expensively assembled outfit at that time when Uncle Jack Walker's successfully bought the Premier League ... the blueprint that Citeh, Chelski and Liverpool then followed ... if Shearer was really that good, why did he achieve **** all with Saints and Newcastle? ...
Yet Munse, Sucky and Squelchy all throw their toys put of the pram at the thought that players who have actually achieved Premier League success without the benefit of that humungous financial backing could ever be considered for the Hall of Fame ... priceless ... the 3 Stooges in overdrive ... no wonder everybody laughs at the numpties eh?
Just make up a few more principles
You 3 girls are a constant source of amusement, as well as being the easiest wind ups on the forum ...
Got Sucky telling us that International achievements can't be counted towards inclusion in the Prem Hall of Fame .. fair enough, I agree, it should be based on Premier League acheivement by definition ... so FA Cup and Champions League acheivement must also be out? ... so on that we can now all agree ... so Slippy Gee gets into the Hall of Fame for beiing in a team that once ran Citeh close ... classic
Munse says it shouldn't be based on trophies, ergo then, not winning the Prem .. so what the **** should it be based on... appearances? .. so if Gareth Barry is not in there, why not? ... if that's the criteria he has just as much right as Slippy Gee, surely? ... so what about Alan Shearer? ... only success in Premiership terms came from being the most expensively assembled outfit at that time when Uncle Jack Walker's successfully bought the Premier League ... the blueprint that Citeh, Chelski and Liverpool then followed ... if Shearer was really that good, why did he achieve **** all with Saints and Newcastle? ...
Yet Munse, Sucky and Squelchy all throw their toys put of the pram at the thought that players who have actually achieved Premier League success without the benefit of that humungous financial backing could ever be considered for the Hall of Fame ... priceless ... the 3 Stooges in overdrive ... no wonder everybody laughs at the numpties eh?
Well spotted Fosse
the hypocrisy of these boys criterias needs outing.
They just want to pencil their own players in by hook or by crook init.
despicable behaviour, anybody trying something like that ...
Mine are simple Munse ... wanna be in the Premier League's Hall of Fame? ... achieve something outstanding or remarkable in the Premier League ... what's your's again? .. seems to shift more often than your cup size
Mine are simple Munse ... wanna be in the Premier League's Hall of Fame? ... achieve something outstanding or remarkable in the Premier League ... what's your's again? .. seems to shift more often than your cup size
Exactly yours is wrong.. It's about adding the best players to have graced the league and not just players that played in good teams.
So Mahrez, Kante and Vardy are shoeins when they retire then? ... great stuff, thanks for clarifying ...
So Mahrez, Kante and Vardy are shoeins when they retire then? ... great stuff, thanks for clarifying ...
I'm comparison to Giggs Scholes and Henry yes they're tripe
Go give your head a wobble ffs.
It was a fair assessment and why he won't ever get in the hall of fame.
Best player in his position in the world ... something that none of the ones you have mentioned were tbf ... good players though they were ....