Those at the bottom deserve the most help. But it isn't the case in the US or the UK. People that have a pretty decent life just want more and more (it's called greed).You seem to have taken a different understanding from the article than I have then. Strikes me that it is saying that it isn't people that are "struggling to get by" more that they are being held back because all the help has been diverted to those at the bottom (including those who won't help themselves) and are resentful that they are being ignored.
The whole aspiration being stifled argument.
After all ISIRTP did say that the poor bottom of the rung still voted Democrat. The poor bottom of the rung in this country never vote Tory. It is the just above the poor that will often vote Tory.
This is the whole crux of the article. The assumption that when we are talking about the working class it means the poor when the reality is working class includes people up to and above the median.
I don't blame them for wanting more, I do blame them for wanting more while watching the real poor suffer even more. Here in the UK we have more and more people needing food banks due to how badly the poor are treat. Yet the middle class who have a job or can feed their family enough don't give a ****.
The artical you posted has so much toxic masculinity in it that it is crazy. "I can't do what I view as a women's job". Maybe they should be happy they can do a job in the first place.