Off Topic Politics Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
The media seem so sure that Jenrick's defection is a great thing for Reform and a terrible thing for the Conservatives. The BBC were asking Badenoch how she felt on 'this terrible day for the Conservatives' and questioning how bad it was for them losing one of their leading lights.

Am I on another planet? I am listening to this thinking this is probably the best day of Badenoch's career, she has just got rid of her main rival in the party, while the Reform link to the failed last government gets stronger? Jenrick is notoriously ambitious, slimy and duplicitous, as well as fairly incompetent at actual delivery (the former immigration minister ffs). I would be amazed if he doesnt end up being a massive pain in the arse for Farage.

Today Badenoch is more secure as Tory leader than she has ever been with the Tory Party slowly starting to creep up the polls and she looks stronger for sacking him first, I do not see how this is anything but good for her, even if I REALLY don't like or rate her (although i'd take her over Reform, just).
The reality is it is a good thing for Badenoch but not the Tories themselves. It bolsters Kemi's position as she looks decisive and in charge but at the same time the defection(s) give the impression that the party's "big names" now think reform is the better chance of top 2 come the next GE.


While some of the names may raise eyebrows the reality is it keeps the momentum for reform and the more people believe they will the the main opposition from the right at a GE the more will vote for them "when the polls narrow" before a GE as people do move to the actual contenders.

So good for Badenoch. She looks like a leader and got rid of her main internal opponent in one foul swoop! But the Tory brand increasingly looks like its had it when its own people are jumping ship.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Archers Road
What a load of rabble.

Centrist candidates collectively have won the most votes at every single election for the past 30 years comfortably.

What people largely object to is the 'socially progressive/ woke' idealogies that have been enforced and the next election could go to reform in protest of that. But they won't be in control for long. It's a house with more back stabbing than the late Roman Republic.

But there's a lot of time between now and May 2029.
This is not the "past 30 years!" This is now! Not a lot more needs to be said. The lefties are starting to poll away from the centre left and the righties are as well from the centre right.

The Green's rise is down to reform's success as well. Once one group shows it is possible to get ahead of the established parties, others gain in confidence as well as normal folks that may have been "would be" switchers for years but felt the need to stick with the big beast to beat the othe big beast.
 
Last edited:
HIGNFY
"Venezuela opposition leader Maria Corina Machado gave her Nobel Peace Prize to Donald Trump and he’ll be back tomorrow for her dinner money. "

Needs a Jim'll Fix It badge next for the hat trick. Or should it be Jeff fixed it for me?
You must log in or register to see images
 
HIGNFY
"Venezuela opposition leader Maria Corina Machado gave her Nobel Peace Prize to Donald Trump and he’ll be back tomorrow for her dinner money. "

Needs a Jim'll Fix It badge next for the hat trick. Or should it be Jeff fixed it for me?
You must log in or register to see images
Embarrassing! Like getting a sticker for being a good boy at the dentist.
 
This is not the "past 30 years!" This is now! Not a lot more needs to be said. The lefties are starting to poll away from the centre left and the righties are as well from the centre right.

The Green's rise is down to reform's success as well. Once one group shows it is possible to get ahead of the established parties, others gain in confidence as well as normal folks that may have been "would be" switchers for years but felt the need to stick with the big beast to beat the othe big beast.
Most people lead very privileged lives in this country by historical standards. Most people want a sensible, central ish government to sensibly look after their income, assets and wealth. Most people know greens and far right or far left parties (I don't actually think this country has any of these...) would be a ****ing disaster.

It would be foolish a significant amount has changed in 20 months.

Side note, if reform gets many defections from "establishment" parties. They must become establishment themselves.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ImpSaint
Most people lead very privileged lives in this country by historical standards. Most people want a sensible, central ish government to sensibly look after their income, assets and wealth. Most people know greens and far right or far left parties (I don't actually think this country has any of these...) would be a ****ing disaster.

It would be foolish a significant amount has changed in 20 months.

Side note, if reform gets many defections from "establishment" parties. They must become establishment themselves.


I don’t think so many people are leading those privileged lives anymore. Look around you; older people, like me, had privileged lives, cheap housing, well paid jobs, and are now looking forward to or enjoying generous pensions. Almost none of that is readily available to our children and grandchildren. Younger people are angry because they can see that privilege being taken away.
 
I don’t think so many people are leading those privileged lives anymore. Look around you; older people, like me, had privileged lives, cheap housing, well paid jobs, and are now looking forward to or enjoying generous pensions. Almost none of that is readily available to our children and grandchildren. Younger people are angry because they can see that privilege being taken away.
Spot on
 
I don’t think so many people are leading those privileged lives anymore. Look around you; older people, like me, had privileged lives, cheap housing, well paid jobs, and are now looking forward to or enjoying generous pensions. Almost none of that is readily available to our children and grandchildren. Younger people are angry because they can see that privilege being taken away.
If the lazy little ****ers had got out of bed and voted remain then their future would have been a lot brighter.
 
If the lazy little ****ers had got out of bed and voted remain then their future would have been a lot brighter.
Actually spot on. We are where we are because of apathy in 2016 and now 'outrage' stirred up by the social media (I won't say media because Facebook, Twitter and Tick Tock isnt media).
 
Actually spot on. We are where we are because of apathy in 2016 and now 'outrage' stirred up by the social media (I won't say media because Facebook, Twitter and Tick Tock isnt media).

Think there's more to it than that personally. Even without that we'd still have the ticking time bomb of people living longer and far less young people owning homes/having pensions than 30-40 years ago.
 
Actually spot on. We are where we are because of apathy in 2016 and now 'outrage' stirred up by the social media (I won't say media because Facebook, Twitter and Tick Tock isnt media).

I think 45 years of libertarian economic policy has had something to do with it too.

When I joined the workforce, public services were in public hands, housing was a necessity not a free market free for all, education was a right not an expensive privilege, most people were members of Trade Unions, there was, by and large, a bond of trust and mutual obligation between employees and employers, public servants served the public interest (or were at least expected to), you knew your bank manager, and if you needed to you could phone a responsible human at the electricity/gas/water board etc.

As for Brexit, yeah it’s impoverished us all. But you’ll find similar problems with widening inequality and limited opportunities, in just about every European country, as well as the USA and Canada.
 
I have no illusions that what pensions I do get come retirement will be worth a lot less than what my parents have and what my grandparents had if anything at all. I will likely have to work far longer than either of them did too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Archers Road
I think 45 years of libertarian economic policy has had something to do with it too.

When I joined the workforce, public services were in public hands, housing was a necessity not a free market free for all, education was a right not an expensive privilege, most people were members of Trade Unions, there was, by and large, a bond of trust and mutual obligation between employees and employers, public servants served the public interest (or were at least expected to), you knew your bank manager, and if you needed to you could phone a responsible human at the electricity/gas/water board etc.

As for Brexit, yeah it’s impoverished us all. But you’ll find similar problems with widening inequality and limited opportunities, in just about every European country, as well as the USA and Canada.
The world has changed a lot. That 45 years coincides with the break up of "job for life" where people had a connection with their workplace and most people would remain working for that company unless they got the boot. workplace social clubs where workers would socialise together at night. These days there is no connection, no loyalty and people look at a few years then moving on as being "loyal."

Trade Unions at that point kinda lost their point in my eyes, and the "bond of trust" you talk about non existent when employer knows the liklihood is this person will be here a few years tops and the employee themselves also know it.