Off Topic Politics Thread
- Thread starter ChilcoSaint
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Grok is the AI on X. Very useful device with a pleasant and helpful personality.
So obviously copy and pasted from Grok
Yes. It explained my point and it’s boring repeating myself to people that seem to be incapable of understanding
Shock. Another argument lost so you resort to insults. Why are the socialists incapable of a discussion?
How do you know it was an insult?
Because socialists are extremely emotional creatures. They often are incapable of using logic. Their fear and anger makes them lash out, as it’s easier than trying to form a coherent argument. This is seen time and time again on here and in wider society.
This also makes them extremely easy to manipulate and control.
Was that from Grok as well?
The irony is that Grok is more capable of independent thought.
Makes me laugh as you literally grokked responses the other day. Yet somehow I have to make all my own points again and again? Even though grok essentially said exactly what I’ve been saying.
Just accept you’ve lost this and that I’m correct, as usual. I will accept your apology again
Not sure how rocket science has come to dominate the politics thread.
Os was always an outlier on this board but the discussions have become a wack-a-mole exercise with the recent posts.
I think it is a wind up. There is no debate , just Os trying to get into everyone's ribs.
I no longer pay much attention to what he is writing as , since Jabbo pointed out , there is no thought behind Os's posts. He is just a minion let alone an engineer. - the only thing Os had probably engineered is his Hampton.
Os was always an outlier on this board but the discussions have become a wack-a-mole exercise with the recent posts.
I think it is a wind up. There is no debate , just Os trying to get into everyone's ribs.
I no longer pay much attention to what he is writing as , since Jabbo pointed out , there is no thought behind Os's posts. He is just a minion let alone an engineer. - the only thing Os had probably engineered is his Hampton.
Shouldn't you be on Not606 junior edition ?
I have no skin in this game, if you are talking about SpaceX. I agree with Puck. You are both right and both wrong.
Says the big girls blouse that can’t win an argument without slinging insults.
You’re the one using childish playground tactics, you called me a child and worse.
I respond with valid points over and over again, and receive constant abuse
Here is an interesting intellectual exercise. How
Can you be furious at cuts to winter fuel allowance but happy about America cutting medicaid that so many elderly people rely on just to stay alive?
Can you be furious at cuts to winter fuel allowance but happy about America cutting medicaid that so many elderly people rely on just to stay alive?
Only a **** would do that.
How is this intellectual? If anything it shows you’re intellectually challenged asking such a dull question.
1) they’re in different countries, with different economies and different needs. You’re comparing chalk and cheese.
2) When have I ever said that I’m happy about Medicaid cuts? You’ve literally made that up.
You’re trying a ‘gotcha’ and its very poorly thought out
Oh so you think I was referring to you? I wonder why?
Excuse one is pathetic. Excuse two is good to hear - glad you can see Elon is doing damage.
Probably because you and jabbo are obsessed with me and can’t go a single post without throwing an insult my way?
How is excuse 1 pathetic? Are you trying to claim that every country should have the exact same welfare policies, regardless of population, debt and other factors?
I am saying that cuts which impact the poorest are always bad no matter where they are. You cannot say UK cuts are evil but give Musk a free pass for achieving the same ends. It is about consistency.