They are not all conscripts. I believe they sent a group who were effectively their elite paratroopers to try and take Kyiv by air - despite not having air superiority and likely assuming they had ground support from pro-Russian groups within Ukraine (that did not exist)Although I think that we should not be celebrating military action, it is quite fascinating to see just how poorly the Russian army has performed. I get the fact that the are conscripts who probably do not wish to be in Ukraine and also appreciate that the resistance they have faced has been unexpected, but the issue of logistics, performance of hardward and general co-ordination has been shockingly bad. I am not sure that anyone really expected that. The number of generals killed in action also strikes me as being unusual. This week the sinking of the cruiser has been the principle revelation. I am surprised that ukraine managed lang at leat one missleon to this ship but, if you take the Russian view that there was a fire on board, the fact that this affected the armaments so comprehensively says a lot about the quality of their sailors. The worrying thing is the threat of nuclear weapons which I am not convinced is as idle as many believe and I cannot understand why the Russian airforce has not been able to be decisive.
I did not appreciate that the Roman general Pompey had earned his reputation in this area of Europe nearly 2100 years ago albeit he was operating a bit to the south of the Black Sea. Reading Adrian Goldworthy's book "In the name of Rome" has been quite interesting in light of Putin's invasion as this teams qith the miltary campaigns of 15 Roman generals. Putin's treatment of Ukraine is akin to what Caesar did in Gaul. Let's hope that the final result is totally different.
But they haven’t exclusively sent conscripts