You must log in or register to see media
There's no way back for her she is the female Gordon Brown....
Depends if they think they can win in 2022. If they don;t they can get rid of her easily. They might want her out sooner anyway. After the next round of Euro talks with Barnier would be a good time, especially if he is taking advantage of May not having her own party's support. They might give the job of finishing Brexit to Gove or Davis with a clear understanding there will be a leadership election in 2021.She will be in the job at least to 2020 as the Tories do not have a replacement with any calibre.
Really nothings changed. No new social housing, extra money for (less un)affordable housing but only vague promises about whether there will be land to use it on. Way more money put into private housing which will probably be competing for the same land. People who have been put into debt due to the the flaws in the change to universal credit will have money 'loaned' to them. Debt to wipe out debt for people struggling to manage money lol (Still an improvement though)
Sigh.
The first and Third red text, no(at least by my definition, or theirs by the way they worded it), they're talking about affordable which is 20% less than market rent and doesn't use the formula for social rent that takes into account local wages etc. usually thats around 60% of market, so what you're on i would guess. Theyre using a cheap trick there where theyve reduced social rent by 1% per year for 4 years to show how caring they are(while also reducing the amount of housing benefit theyre paying themselves), but at the same time encouraging councils and housing associations change the tenancy for these properties to affordable which is much higher. If you're on an assured tenancy you're fine as it can't be forced on you. although they've reduced the security on newer tenancies to the 7 year ones. The second red text, i think, is referring to proper social housing, but its so vague i just ignored it, i took it to mean the government will allow it in special circumstances."We will encourage councils as well as housing associations to bid for this money and provide certainty over future rent levels. And in those parts of the country where the need is greatest, allow homes to be built for social rent, well below market level."
and
"A new generation of council houses to help fix our broken housing market."
So if a council bids for this money and then the social rent is well below market level...............that doesn't count as social housing? Sounds just like the deal I have with my council house. Owned by council, Rent about 3/5ths of private rent.
The first and Third red text, no(at least by my definition, or theirs by the way they worded it), they're talking about affordable which is 20% less than market rent and doesn't use the formula for social rent that takes into account local wages etc. usually thats around 60% of market, so what you're on i would guess. Theyre using a cheap trick there where theyve reduced social rent by 1% per year for 4 years to show how caring they are(while also reducing the amount of housing benefit theyre paying themselves), but at the same time encouraging councils and housing associations change the tenancy for these properties to affordable which is much higher. If you're on an assured tenancy you're fine as it can't be forced on you. although they've reduced the security on newer tenancies to the 7 year ones. The second red text, i think, is referring to proper social housing, but its so vague i just ignored it, i took it to mean the government will allow it in special circumstances.
You'll often find that you'll have neighbors on the same estate with an identical home from the same landlord with quite different rents because of that.
Anyway, if they want to fix the housing crisis they have to focus on providing land to build on. They mentioned it several times but weren't specific as to how so i'm not holding great hope of improvement but i don't really know what their strategy is there.
The first and Third red text, no(at least by my definition, or theirs by the way they worded it), they're talking about affordable which is 20% less than market rent and doesn't use the formula for social rent that takes into account local wages etc. usually thats around 60% of market, so what you're on i would guess. Theyre using a cheap trick there where theyve reduced social rent by 1% per year for 4 years to show how caring they are(while also reducing the amount of housing benefit theyre paying themselves), but at the same time encouraging councils and housing associations change the tenancy for these properties to affordable which is much higher. If you're on an assured tenancy you're fine as it can't be forced on you. although they've reduced the security on newer tenancies to the 7 year ones. The second red text, i think, is referring to proper social housing, but its so vague i just ignored it, i took it to mean the government will allow it in special circumstances.
You'll often find that you'll have neighbors on the same estate with an identical home from the same landlord with quite different rents because of that.
Anyway, if they want to fix the housing crisis they have to focus on providing land to build on. They mentioned it several times but weren't specific as to how so i'm not holding great hope of improvement but i don't really know what their strategy is there.
Venezuela
