Yeah, quite agree. One of the issues appears to be that all courses (even if they are pretty random and lead to a pretty "nothing" degree in terms of career) must be 3 years long, so you get the situation where Bernard (or Bernardette of course) gets to go to 4 lectures a week on social engineering in Ancient Greece, leaving a load of time to go out and spend all that lovely loan money .............
In my day (yes I'm old) I was at uni first thing (9 am!

) Monday morning and only had Wednesday afternoon off, when we played rugby (I went to Cardiff) ...... Of course, that WAS a Maths degree (and I only stuck it for a year), but I know so many students now who only have between 5 and 10 lectures a week. Couldn't they then condense the course into 2 years max? I applaud Beefy for going the quicker route - my son went to Plymouth to do IT, dropped out after a year and got a job with a company who let him do a year's evening course on various techy stuff (at his expense). He qualified and now earns 3 times what my daughter gets - and she has a Masters degree!
Tech Colleges should have remained the same - giving apprenticeships and technical skills and these "dumb" degrees should be outlawed. If the thought of coming out saddled with debt puts someone off doing a degree in Baking Technology Management (and, yes, there IS a degree of that name) then good, say I!
OR ........... and this would be really radical, students could actually get paid work whilst at Uni (in between lectures) - a friend of mine's niece left Edinburgh Uni with no debt at all, because she took various jobs in her free time and earned enough so she could pay off her debt at the end. Radical, eh?