4th and 5th-placed Paralympians don't win anything so aren't winners, just as 4th or 5th-placed Olympians who don't win anything are also not winners. It's obvious why you specified Paralympians because you desperately want someone to call disabled athletes losers and failures for not winning a medal. You're so pathetic.
Expected response from a sad, little man whose age and IQ added together would still be double-digits
Honestly Chazz. Let me explain the best I can. If two teams go to a cup final one wins, the other doesn’t. The one that wins is the winner. The other team loses. Best thing you can do is treat both imposters the same.
Just in case you wanted to ask if I like Kipling I have to say I’ve never Kipeld. Edit. Is Kipelled right Askew ? Put me right please !
Bizarrely while googling double kipeld in cake making, I did stumble across this... https://totalfootballanalysis.com/article/tactical-theory-the-role-of-a-double-pivot-in-build-up Isn't it stating the absolute obvious? And as for a lower block, is that the defender lying down behind the defensive wall at freekicks?
There was an obvious reason for this strategy. Maybe to waste time, wear defenders out. etc. It does make sense. I'm going to patent this tactic and call it 'Wonky Snooker Table' Sell it to Computer game programmer's and then it will change football. Edit. I may have shared too much
