Match Day Thread Poland v England

[Chazz Rheinhold]

Either you win it or you don’t mate. Just like Alf Ramsey.

So those paralympians are all failures then ?

 

[Kalman]

So those paralympians are all failures then ?

Weak bait.

 

[Chazz Rheinhold]

Weak bait.

Either you win or you don’t
We’re his words
Harsh but true
Grrrr you winners are tough

 

[Kalman]

Either you win or you don’t
We’re his words
Harsh but true
Grrrr you winners are tough

4th and 5th-placed Paralympians don't win anything so aren't winners, just as 4th or 5th-placed Olympians who don't win anything are also not winners.

It's obvious why you specified Paralympians because you desperately want someone to call disabled athletes losers and failures for not winning a medal. You're so pathetic.

 

[Chazz Rheinhold]

4th and 5th-placed Paralympians don't win anything so aren't winners, just as 4th or 5th-placed Olympians who don't win anything are also not winners.

It's obvious why you specified Paralympians because you desperately want someone to call disabled athletes losers and failures for not winning a medal. You're so pathetic.

Wah wah wah

 

[Kalman]

Wah wah wah

Expected response from a sad, little man whose age and IQ added together would still be double-digits

 

[Chazz Rheinhold]

Expected response from a sad, little man whose age and IQ added together would still be double-digits

Really you expected that? Knew I shoulda gone with a double pivots joke
Damn

 

[Kalman]

Either you win or you don’t
We’re his words
Harsh but true
Grrrr you winners are tough

*were

 

[Porthmeor Tiger]

So those paralympians are all failures then ?

Honestly Chazz. Let me explain the best I can. If two teams go to a cup final one wins, the other doesn’t. The one that wins is the winner. The other team loses. Best thing you can do is treat both imposters the same.

 

[Chazz Rheinhold]

*were

You’ve hit rock bottom

 

[Porthmeor Tiger]

Just in case you wanted to ask if I like Kipling I have to say I’ve never Kipeld.

Edit. Is Kipelled right Askew ? Put me right please !

 

[askewshair]

Just in case you wanted to ask if I like Kipling I have to say I’ve never Kipeld.

Double Kipeld?

 

[balkan tiger]

Just in case you wanted to ask if I like Kipling I have to say I’ve never Kipeld.

He does make exceedingly good cakes.

 

[RayVonn]

He does make exceedingly good cakes.

If..:

 

[RayVonn]

Just in case you wanted to ask if I like Kipling I have to say I’ve never Kipeld.

It’s a jungle out there…

 

[Porthmeor Tiger]

I’ve laughed at these. In fact I had more glee.

 

[askewshair]

Double Kipeld?

Bizarrely while googling double kipeld in cake making, I did stumble across this...
https://totalfootballanalysis.com/article/tactical-theory-the-role-of-a-double-pivot-in-build-up

Isn't it stating the absolute obvious?
And as for a lower block, is that the defender lying down behind the defensive wall at freekicks?

 

[askewshair]

Second half reminded me of that wonky home snooker table, when all the balls end up in one corner. All the play was in the far corner (left side upfront), with Grealish, Mount, Shaw, and then Kane, Phillips, Rice, Harry dipping in and playing it very tight but no one seemed able or willing to spread it. All I could assume was that the pitch tilted dramatically into that corner.
Not sure if there are any stats that show percentage in that quarter (am been very generous with the quarter)

There was an obvious reason for this strategy. Maybe to waste time, wear defenders out. etc. It does make sense. I'm going to patent this tactic and call it 'Wonky Snooker Table'
Sell it to Computer game programmer's and then it will change football.
Edit. I may have shared too much

 

[City Man]

You must log in or register to see images