Off Topic Pointless point-scoring thread
- Thread starter RebelBhoy
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Police have charged a Belfast city councillor with “grossly offensive communication” after Facebook comments she made about a planned republican parade in County Tyrone.
Ruth Patterson, a DUP councillor, was commenting on a post about a planned republican rally in Castlederg, County Tyrone, commemorating the deaths 30 years ago of two IRA men blown up by a bomb which they intended to plant in the town.
After one user commented about a fictional attack on the parade, in which Sinn Féin members were killed, Patterson wrote: “We would have done a great service to Northern Ireland and the world.” She later apologised, saying: "I recognise that my careless comments fall short of the standards expected of anyone holding a responsible post. I deeply and sincerely apologise.“
The 57-year-old was arrested on Friday morning and released from a south Belfast police station ofter 10pm. She is due to appear in court to answer the charge on 22 August.
The DUP has criticised the arrest, describing it as “sensationalist”, and a crowd of about 30 supporters gathered outside the police station while she was being questioned, with signs calling for her release.
In a statement, the party said: “Councillor Ruth Patterson has apologised for her remarks, accepted they were well below the standard expected of a public representative and not in keeping with the DUP's values and ethos.
“The party officers also emphasised the unacceptable nature of these stupid and obnoxious comments and will conclude its own internal investigations.
“We fail to understand why the police chose to conduct a sensationalist arrest rather than contact Ruth and ask her to attend an Article 10 voluntary interview. This is a matter we will be raising with the chief constable.”
Police said that when a report is made to them “regarding information posted on social media sites, officers will investigate and where a criminal offence has occurred, appropriate action will be taken”.
Earlier on Friday, the police said the public order inquiry team had “arrested a 57-year-old female in relation to offences concerning the sending of grossly offensive communications and other serious criminal offences in relation to intimidation and encouraging criminal acts”.
Speaking before the arrest, Sinn Féin MLA Barry McElduff said the comments made by Mrs Patterson were “shocking”.
He said: “This type of talk is totally irresponsible and highly dangerous.
“As has been shown in the past, comments made by political representatives and others can not only inflame a situation, but actually motivate people to act on their words.”
Ruth Patterson, a DUP councillor, was commenting on a post about a planned republican rally in Castlederg, County Tyrone, commemorating the deaths 30 years ago of two IRA men blown up by a bomb which they intended to plant in the town.
After one user commented about a fictional attack on the parade, in which Sinn Féin members were killed, Patterson wrote: “We would have done a great service to Northern Ireland and the world.” She later apologised, saying: "I recognise that my careless comments fall short of the standards expected of anyone holding a responsible post. I deeply and sincerely apologise.“
The 57-year-old was arrested on Friday morning and released from a south Belfast police station ofter 10pm. She is due to appear in court to answer the charge on 22 August.
The DUP has criticised the arrest, describing it as “sensationalist”, and a crowd of about 30 supporters gathered outside the police station while she was being questioned, with signs calling for her release.
In a statement, the party said: “Councillor Ruth Patterson has apologised for her remarks, accepted they were well below the standard expected of a public representative and not in keeping with the DUP's values and ethos.
“The party officers also emphasised the unacceptable nature of these stupid and obnoxious comments and will conclude its own internal investigations.
“We fail to understand why the police chose to conduct a sensationalist arrest rather than contact Ruth and ask her to attend an Article 10 voluntary interview. This is a matter we will be raising with the chief constable.”
Police said that when a report is made to them “regarding information posted on social media sites, officers will investigate and where a criminal offence has occurred, appropriate action will be taken”.
Earlier on Friday, the police said the public order inquiry team had “arrested a 57-year-old female in relation to offences concerning the sending of grossly offensive communications and other serious criminal offences in relation to intimidation and encouraging criminal acts”.
Speaking before the arrest, Sinn Féin MLA Barry McElduff said the comments made by Mrs Patterson were “shocking”.
He said: “This type of talk is totally irresponsible and highly dangerous.
“As has been shown in the past, comments made by political representatives and others can not only inflame a situation, but actually motivate people to act on their words.”
But she apologised, so that should have made everything all right ... wonder why they just didn't accept that? 
But she apologised, so that should have made everything all right ... wonder why they just didn't accept that?
"she" - there's a clue
Don't really know if this is the right place to post this, but it seems there was an investigation into the Rangers charity...
OSCR-
"Trustee A did not respond to any of our requests
for information, including a request for information
about other charity trustee roles. As a result, we
have been unable to assess the risk posed to other
charities of which Trustee A may be a charity
trustee. Should we become aware that Trustee A is
a charity trustee of another charity we will consider
the risk this might pose. We have made Trustee A
aware of our finding of breach of charity trustee duties"
"It appears to OSCR that none of the trustee
duties relating to conflicts of interest has been
recognised or managed appropriately by the
charity trustees."
"OSCR has concluded its inquiry into the actions
of Rangers Charity Foundation (‘the Charity’
in
agreeing to forego most of its share of the
proceeds of a fundraising event in favour of The
Rangers Football Club plc (in Administration).
• OSCR found that the Charity’s decision-making
process which allowed important decisions to be
made by one trustee acting alone was in breach
of trustees’ duties and constituted misconduct on
the part of the charity trustees as a whole.
• OSCR also found that the way the decision
regarding the fundraising event was taken did
not comply with the requirements of the Charity’s
Trust Deed.
• OSCR identified that issues of conflict of interest
inherent in the Charity’s structure had not been
appropriately dealt with."
"Based on the information provided to us, we
further consider that the decision-making
process in the Charity, which allowed a decision
to be taken by one trustee to assign the
Agreement with AC Milan Glorie to The Rangers
Football Club plc (in Administration) without
consultation with the other charity trustees and
without a quorum, was in breach of the charity
trustee duties. In addition, the conflict of interest
presented by the assignation was not managed
appropriately and professional advice was not
obtained as required by the Charity’s Trust Deed."
OSCR-
"Trustee A did not respond to any of our requests
for information, including a request for information
about other charity trustee roles. As a result, we
have been unable to assess the risk posed to other
charities of which Trustee A may be a charity
trustee. Should we become aware that Trustee A is
a charity trustee of another charity we will consider
the risk this might pose. We have made Trustee A
aware of our finding of breach of charity trustee duties"
"It appears to OSCR that none of the trustee
duties relating to conflicts of interest has been
recognised or managed appropriately by the
charity trustees."
"OSCR has concluded its inquiry into the actions
of Rangers Charity Foundation (‘the Charity’
inagreeing to forego most of its share of the
proceeds of a fundraising event in favour of The
Rangers Football Club plc (in Administration).
• OSCR found that the Charity’s decision-making
process which allowed important decisions to be
made by one trustee acting alone was in breach
of trustees’ duties and constituted misconduct on
the part of the charity trustees as a whole.
• OSCR also found that the way the decision
regarding the fundraising event was taken did
not comply with the requirements of the Charity’s
Trust Deed.
• OSCR identified that issues of conflict of interest
inherent in the Charity’s structure had not been
appropriately dealt with."
"Based on the information provided to us, we
further consider that the decision-making
process in the Charity, which allowed a decision
to be taken by one trustee to assign the
Agreement with AC Milan Glorie to The Rangers
Football Club plc (in Administration) without
consultation with the other charity trustees and
without a quorum, was in breach of the charity
trustee duties. In addition, the conflict of interest
presented by the assignation was not managed
appropriately and professional advice was not
obtained as required by the Charity’s Trust Deed."
Don't really know if this is the right place to post this, but it seems there was an investigation into the Rangers charity...
OSCR-
"Trustee A did not respond to any of our requests
for information, including a request for information
about other charity trustee roles. As a result, we
have been unable to assess the risk posed to other
charities of which Trustee A may be a charity
trustee. Should we become aware that Trustee A is
a charity trustee of another charity we will consider
the risk this might pose. We have made Trustee A
aware of our finding of breach of charity trustee duties"
"It appears to OSCR that none of the trustee
duties relating to conflicts of interest has been
recognised or managed appropriately by the
charity trustees."
"OSCR has concluded its inquiry into the actions
of Rangers Charity Foundation (‘the Charity’
agreeing to forego most of its share of the
proceeds of a fundraising event in favour of The
Rangers Football Club plc (in Administration).
• OSCR found that the Charity’s decision-making
process which allowed important decisions to be
made by one trustee acting alone was in breach
of trustees’ duties and constituted misconduct on
the part of the charity trustees as a whole.
• OSCR also found that the way the decision
regarding the fundraising event was taken did
not comply with the requirements of the Charity’s
Trust Deed.
• OSCR identified that issues of conflict of interest
inherent in the Charity’s structure had not been
appropriately dealt with."
"Based on the information provided to us, we
further consider that the decision-making
process in the Charity, which allowed a decision
to be taken by one trustee to assign the
Agreement with AC Milan Glorie to The Rangers
Football Club plc (in Administration) without
consultation with the other charity trustees and
without a quorum, was in breach of the charity
trustee duties. In addition, the conflict of interest
presented by the assignation was not managed
appropriately and professional advice was not
obtained as required by the Charity’s Trust Deed."
The full report is very damning.
Trustee A is some boy....
Our hero sitting in between Nick Griffin's lost twin brothers
http://willievass.photoshelter.com/...FKuAioPFQqc/I0000fm.AZNwKwtE/C0000fKmWUmT9Awk
http://willievass.photoshelter.com/...FKuAioPFQqc/I0000fm.AZNwKwtE/C0000fKmWUmT9Awk
rogueleader
suave gringo
The 'Sit In' after the game
http://willievass.photoshelter.com/...FKuAioPFQqc/I0000WOZjBT7xusA/C0000fKmWUmT9Awk
http://willievass.photoshelter.com/...FKuAioPFQqc/I0000WOZjBT7xusA/C0000fKmWUmT9Awk