Off Topic Pointless point-scoring thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
DevAdvocate said:
I really don’t know which is sadder – the Daily Record continuing their vindictive campaign against Charles Green, or that they are doing so devoid of the facts. The latest piece by Gary Ralston which claims that Charles Green is NOT in talks with George Soros to invest in Rangers is a poor piece of journalism, either because the Record are trying to discredit Charles Green or because their journos are just too lazy to dig deeper for facts.
Thankfully, most Rangers fans shun the Record for their blatant hostility to Rangers and many will see through this smear job on Green. I can assure Rangers fans that Charles Green is actively seeking top-drawer investors for the club and I have seen and have in my possession documentation that rubbishes the Record’s claims.

Rangers supporters can make up their own mind about Green’s involvement at Ibrox but they should do so based on the truth, not upon agenda-driven smears. The saddest thing about this is that there are people out there who claim to be Rangers supporters but who are actively seeking to dissuade investment into the club from people who could take Rangers to the next level.

I have had cause to praise the Record in the past for some fearless reporting. But this hatchet job on Charles Green is very much proof of falling standards in journalism here in Scotland. Speaking of doing a number on somebody, today’s lesson is don’t mess with Vincent Tan. The wee Cardiff owner, who is like a caricature of himself, has bided his time and delivered the ultimate head shot to Mallky Mackay’s future career prospects.
Mackay has allegedly been involved in text conversations which are racist and sexist, apparently including racial slurs on Jews. I can think of one famous club where this would go down well but it certainly won’t endear him to clubs in the English Prem.

Mackay was showing great promise as a manager and could have followed in the footsteps of famous Scots like Ferguson, Busby and Shankly. Instead, his indiscretion may see him robbed of this chance and he could end up back in Scotland managing a much smaller team.
Unless, of course, Hamas ever start a football team where he would be a hot favourite for the job. On a serious note, it is sad to see Mackay’s career disintegrate in such a fashion. His and Iain Moody’s attempts to pass off the texts as “friendly banter” between them are understandable but in the PC world we live in, it’s a lame excuse.

Tan’s revenge on fans’ hero Mackay could provide a wee moral to Rangers fans who are thinking about the possible involvement of big beast investors like George Soros. Nobody messes with these guys. They take no prisoners and take no crap from anybody.
Exactly what Rangers could be doing with, if you ask me.
Click to expand...

The esteem that I hold the rhebel in can be described as this , [ don't mean to be crude , sorry if you are offended ] when I was working underground I needed a **** , the handiest thing to **** on was the rhebel that someone had left lying around , that sums up absolutely how I feel about the Vatican rhebel , a stinking rotten apology for a newspaper with mostly stinking rotten journalists [ bluenoses excluded ] , I just hope Bill that your confidence in C.G and Soros has some forthcoming dividend ,We need a strong minded individual like C.G to get in amongst the hate mob at the CSFA ,and the CSPL ,Another season started with No major sponsor for the “top ” division , oh’ yes ,they are all clever men , bunch of ****ing chancers that’s what they are .

remember all you timmy’s , State Aid fc, Tick follows Tock follows Tick follows Tock , it’s coming ,I kid you not ,it’s coming .!!!!!

SO MOTE IT BE .!!!!!
Click to expand...

<laugh> WTF
 
rogueleader said:
I don't see an issue with this tbh. It has never been our club that was founded on bigotry.


There are many of them that actually believe this
Click to expand...

That thread about the football being sent to Cork City is up there with the most mental ones I have read <laugh>
 
Dan Starkey said:
The poor sods who stood up for the club are being treated like Nazi sympathisers!
Click to expand...

every team has a percentage of ****ing idiots that follow it. the rangers just seem to have a higher percentage. they are like the gift that keeps on giving. imagine giving a **** about who your club sent a football to.
 
Feel free to stop me from quoting that thread but...

Some of us value our Loyalist and Protestant heritage more than others, the disease of modernism hasn't much use for history and tradition.
Click to expand...

What's angry got to with it, the clubs been ****ed from pillar to post, we are still not going anywhere, and we congratulate a side that represents the bastards that hate us to our destruction, No wonder Rangers are in a state, even some of the support find nothing wrong with it.
We are a laughing stock of a club, the tarriers are laughing every day at us aided and abetted by ourselves.
Click to expand...
 
Ca Thars


Cathars tends to agree with the comments of a fellow poster, (Talking about himself in the 3rd person = ****) Ricsherry. If there is no Roman influence within the EU. Why does the EU flag contain the stars of Mary? (WTF? <yikes>)and we all know how important Mary is to the Roman. <laugh>

is it not coincidental, that the 1st Minister advocates quite strongly Independence in Europe. Whether one believes Rome&#8217;s influence is diminishing, albeit through the abuse scandals. The way a Roman responds to constructive criticism regarding the Institutionalised child abuse and the failure to acknowledge the victims before the perpetrators by defending and deflecting, shows the influence of Rome and the Roman may not be as weak as is perceived.

On the point of secularism, lets hark back to the days of the Killing Times, notably the Divine Right of Kings. History has shown the power of the ordinary man and what this faith can achieve through the Covenanters. The Covenanters through strong faith and an even stronger COS defended the faith the likes which have never been seen again.

However, that is to say, the Defence of the Faith through Covenanter&#8217;s shall not rise once again. We have witnessed recently a Conventicle conducted at Alexander Peden&#8217;s stone. Where men, women, and children worshipped reminiscent of days of old. Maybe the faith is not as strong as in the old days, but to fight the threat of the secularism, a strong COS must come to the fore and provide the guidance for battle for some which may be required.

Cathars sees striking similarities (He&#8217;s way back to the 3[SUP]rd[/SUP] person again) between Secularism and Romanism. The main aim of both is to destroy Christianity. It should be remembered, Christianity has been battling Romanism since the Council of Nicea through the attempted destruction of all who oppose Romanism. For their is no doubt, the rising battle between Christianity and Secularism is being fought on two fronts. The correct call has already been written by a fellow poster, if Christianity is defeated by Secularism, She will be replaced by Romanism.

For they are Roman, Christianity&#8217;s Shame.
 
DevAdvocate said:
Ca Thars


Cathars tends to agree with the comments of a fellow poster, (Talking about himself in the 3rd person = ****) Ricsherry. If there is no Roman influence within the EU. Why does the EU flag contain the stars of Mary? (WTF? <yikes>)and we all know how important Mary is to the Roman. <laugh>

is it not coincidental, that the 1st Minister advocates quite strongly Independence in Europe. Whether one believes Rome&#8217;s influence is diminishing, albeit through the abuse scandals. The way a Roman responds to constructive criticism regarding the Institutionalised child abuse and the failure to acknowledge the victims before the perpetrators by defending and deflecting, shows the influence of Rome and the Roman may not be as weak as is perceived.

On the point of secularism, lets hark back to the days of the Killing Times, notably the Divine Right of Kings. History has shown the power of the ordinary man and what this faith can achieve through the Covenanters. The Covenanters through strong faith and an even stronger COS defended the faith the likes which have never been seen again.

However, that is to say, the Defence of the Faith through Covenanter&#8217;s shall not rise once again. We have witnessed recently a Conventicle conducted at Alexander Peden&#8217;s stone. Where men, women, and children worshipped reminiscent of days of old. Maybe the faith is not as strong as in the old days, but to fight the threat of the secularism, a strong COS must come to the fore and provide the guidance for battle for some which may be required.

Cathars sees striking similarities (He&#8217;s way back to the 3[SUP]rd[/SUP] person again) between Secularism and Romanism. The main aim of both is to destroy Christianity. It should be remembered, Christianity has been battling Romanism since the Council of Nicea through the attempted destruction of all who oppose Romanism. For their is no doubt, the rising battle between Christianity and Secularism is being fought on two fronts. The correct call has already been written by a fellow poster, if Christianity is defeated by Secularism, She will be replaced by Romanism.

For they are Roman, Christianity&#8217;s Shame.
Click to expand...

Admit it. You miss Leggo.
 
I was at Ibrox on Saturday for a surprise 30[SUP]th[/SUP]. I saw a room called the Wilton room, went in&#8230;

Nearly fookin drowned!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back