Player Registration

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
aldotheapache said:
If it's not important to you why have you asked it four times now ?

Sorry Dev but thats another fail . There is nothing in my post to indicate I was talking about anybody in here apart from Gambol . I didn't mention Medro you did . You would need to ask him but I don't think I've ever upset Medro .

When talking about sash bashers I meant the loyalist obsessed members of the Rangers support that I have encountered through the years and I manage to upset quite easily .

You could say I'm a bit of iconoclast but you would be wrong ......again .
Click to expand...


You said "That is why I have upset Gambol and the rest of the sash bashers" and then, in some desperate attempt to backtrack you said"There is nothing in my post to indicate I was talking about anybody in here".

Okay i'll let you off the hook (even though I have just driven a truck through the massive hole in your logic) and simply ask why you think Gambol is supportive of the Orange Order?

I've known Gambol for the better part of 7 years and i've never seen him show any sympathy or interest in them whatsoever either on this forum or others.
 
DevAdvocate said:
You said "That is why I have upset Gambol and the rest of the sash bashers" and then, in some desperate attempt to backtrack you said"There is nothing in my post to indicate I was talking about anybody in here".

Okay i'll let you off the hook (even though I have just driven a truck through the massive hole in your logic) and simply ask why you think Gambol is supportive of the Orange Order?

I've known Gambol for the better part of 7 years and i've never seen him show any sympathy or interest in them whatsoever either on this forum or others.
Click to expand...

Now you have resorted to telling lies Div .

What I actually said was ......There is nothing in my post to indicate I was talking about anybody in here apart from Gambol

Do you honestly think that no one can see you resorting to these idiotic tactics to try and win an argument ? The only truck your driving is the one through your own honesty .

I don't know Gambol but he strikes me as a bit of a petulant **** . Much the same as yourself . But then again Gambol doesn't know ne so he shouldn't really be labelling me a timposter should he ?

If he can't take **** being thrown at him then he shouldn't cast the first stool eh . And he certainly shouldn't align himself to manure like you .
 
aldotheapache said:
Now you have resorted to telling lies Div .

What I actually said was ......There is nothing in my post to indicate I was talking about anybody in here apart from Gambol

Do you honestly think that no one can see you resorting to these idiotic tactics to try and win an argument ? The only truck your driving is the one through your own honesty .

I don't know Gambol but he strikes me as a bit of a petulant **** . Much the same as yourself . But then again Gambol doesn't know ne so he shouldn't really be labelling me a timposter should he ?

If he can't take **** being thrown at him then he shouldn't cast the first stool eh . And he certainly shouldn't align himself to manure like you .
Click to expand...

Oh deary me. I was thinking it might take a bit longer to draw a definitive answer from you but you've gone and done all my work for me in one post.

<laugh>
 
DevAdvocate said:
Oh deary me. I was thinking it might take a bit longer to draw a definitive answer from you but you've gone and done all my work for me in one post.

<laugh>
Click to expand...

The definitive answer being you will stoop to any level to try and win an argument but rarely do you actually win one .

And rarely do you answer a question posed to you .

Hypocrisy thy name is Dev .<rofl>
 
aldotheapache said:
The definitive answer being you will stoop to any level to try and win an argument but rarely do you actually win one .

And rarely do you answer a question posed to you .

Hypocrisy thy name is Dev .
Click to expand...

You never asked me any questions, this was not an argument, you gave me the answers I wanted. All you've done is prove my point for me. (A point which has evaded you the whole time).

I certainly don't need any fake <laugh>s or <rofl>s to convince myself that i'm right.
 
DevAdvocate said:
You never asked me any questions, this was not an argument, you gave me the answers I wanted. All you've done is prove my point for me. (A point which has evaded you the whole time).

I certainly don't need any fake <laugh>s or <rofl>s to convince myself that i'm right.
Click to expand...

I didn't ask you any questions !

Yes I did .

You can tell the questions . They are the sentences that end in a question nark

I am sure I have explained this grammatical concept to you before .

It's obviously far too complicated for you to absorb .

Nevermind eh .
 
aldotheapache said:
I didn't ask you any questions !

Yes I did .

You can tell the questions . They are the sentences that end in a question nark

I am sure I have explained this grammatical concept to you before .

It's obviously far too complicated for you to absorb .

Nevermind eh .
Click to expand...


I meant serious questions, all you've asked is a series of infantile rhetorical questions, which are pretty much typical of your debating style. As I said this was not an argument and if I did not answer any of your pointless questions so that's all down to you for not refusing to answer mine.

My work here is done, but I sense another post from you telling me how stupid I am, after all, you are nothing if not predictable.

In summary (according to you):

Gambol =Sash Basher
Dev = Idiot

ps Aldi, If I were you I really would not try and point out the apparent flaws in other people's grammar. Your post - quoted here- is a pretty good example of how not to use grammar properly.
 
Where does the expression, "I could care less" come from? Obviously the yanks say it, but it doesn't make any sense at all. In fact, because of that, I am leaving this forum, oh yes, siree bob, or what every other **** says on a weekly basis!
 
monacoger said:
Where does the expression, "I could care less" come from? Obviously the yanks say it, but it doesn't make any sense at all. In fact, because of that, I am leaving this forum, oh yes, siree bob, or what every other **** says on a weekly basis!
Click to expand...

Americanisms seldom make any sense Monaco.
 
DevAdvocate said:
I meant serious questions, all you've asked is a series of infantile rhetorical questions, which are pretty much typical of your debating style. As I said this was not an argument and if I did not answer any of your pointless questions so that's all down to you for not refusing to answer mine.

My work here is done, but I sense another post from you telling me how stupid I am, after all, you are nothing if not predictable.

In summary (according to you):

Gambol =Sash Basher
Dev = Idiot

ps Aldi, If I were you I really would not try and point out the apparent flaws in other people's grammar. Your post - quoted here- is a pretty good example of how not to use grammar properly.
Click to expand...

So no questions answered then . Yet you started this pish today by moaning I ignored your question .

You better add hypocrite to idiot in your summation.
 
aldotheapache said:
So no questions answered then . Yet you started this pish today by moaning I ignored your question .

You better add hypocrite to idiot in your summation.
Click to expand...

Pretty much as expected, 10/10 for predictabliity Aldi and the grammar's still not right, you left out a question mark after the first sentence <ok>
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back