oooh sounds like a legal type person so we don’t need Roofie or Les back as we have our new Legal Beagle
tbh @PINKIE just use the Hammers board there's only one fan on there and you can just call him tubby with no consequence.
@brb Mr. Speaker, I for one would like to remind the honorable gentleman, Chair of the Spurs benches, that this vote was in fact called by the Honorable member from Huddersfield, not in fact, the honorable member from Cornwall. As the honorable member from Huddersfield in fact sits on the Spurs benches in the house, this is a Tottenham fan poll. The poll was posted for House consumption, and of the 7 votes directing the Honorable member from Cornwall to "**** off" 3 of those were cast by Non-Spurs representatives of the House. The Spurs Chair has, in that sense, benefited from "migrant voting." So, while I respect the Chair of the Spurs fans in the house opinion on this matter, I do believe it is in fact incorrect. The democratic vote of this hallowed hall MUST STAND! please log in to view this image
I'll let you know when I've finished making them up. There's only one really, beyond the standard ones for the forum. Don't insult or abuse other forum members that are eligible to post on the Spurs board.
May the honorable gentleman please explain this part please, what would make one ineligible? The honorable gentleman for Everton @Tobes has also been subject to rampant and improper House conduct as of late from the Leeds benches and I think we need an explanation in board eligibility.
I think misusing ones powers and forming a dictatorship is treason and would get you 10+ years in the slammer mate.
Indeed. This motion was brought forward by a Spurs fan in order to determine the outcome on the Spurs board. The Spurs mod had already indicated, with reference to the honourable member for Cornwall, that his presence on the Spurs board was determined by a democratic vote and that the democratic process must be respected. It is therefore incumbent on the Spurs mod to enact the democratic process and reinstate the honourable member for Cornwall back on the Spurs board. Should he fail to discharge his ministerial responsibilities, then it will be for the speaker of the house @brb to take the necessary action and do it for him, whilst deciding what action to take for such flagrant disregard for the house rules.
I'm of the opinion that if you're a mod and come on here insulting and wumming, knowing you won't get banned, but then ban people for the same on you're own board, you aren't fit to be a mod.
Forum users are eligible until they do something to become ineligible. Insulting or abusing you would be unacceptable, for example. Insulting or abusing Piskie would be fine.
You can’t take anything he says at face value mate. Bleats about the rules on the Spud board, but then comes on here and breaks all of them with impunity. Champions the democratic process and then flagrantly ignores it when a decision goes against him. The double standards render his opinions null and void I’m afraid.
