But that's not what I said, I was referring to younger supporters in general. I'm 26 (which granted, isn't that young anymore) and if somebody who'd just got their first pass was talking to me about being locked out of BP (with a decent opinion), I wouldn't belittle them for not having been there. I wouldn't ask you to apologise pal, as you clearly aren't the type of supporter I'm referring to. It's the ones who have this facetious air of elitism simply because they've been going longer. I'm not saying they didn't enjoy it, simply that it doesn't make their opinions on City (or indeed as you pointed out, any other matter) any more valid than my own.
think u want an argument....u started going when u were 5...respect man....from any normal(that word again)fan. beats me...i started going to city when i was 9....so u 4 more years knowledgeble on me for a kick off!
[Stockholm Tiger to Crash Gate 9, 7:10 yesterday] You're one sic short, smarty pants. Try again, why don't you?
Honestly, seems perfectly clear to me. He's suggesting you're a scared ****, and that you're either between 9 and 15 years old, or you act like that. He's right too. You've raised the levels of ****ishness on this forums 100 fold all on your own these past couple of days.
Well I read it as he's suggesting you're not a *****phile if you go with a 9 yr old cos he reckons you're only a ***** if you have sex with a baby it a toddler
18 or 20 maybe, but not 25. Take the OP, for example - he's only 26 but if he started going in 1993 he saw a whole decade of **** (barring Deano) before any success.
Actually you're probably right I could have disagreed with the analogy without highlighting the spelling mistake as that was a little bit c*ntish
I'm of a similar age and saw a whole decade of ****. And got bullied for supporting a team no one had ever heard of. Even an 18/20 year old could have been exposed to the bad times. And they were bad.
