1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Penalty or No Penalty?

Discussion in 'Wycombe' started by theblues, Dec 28, 2011.

?

Penalty or No Penalty?

  1. Penalty

  2. No Penalty

Multiple votes are allowed.
Results are only viewable after voting.
  1. theblues

    theblues Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2011
    Messages:
    320
    Likes Received:
    0
    Personally, I think that despite what Bull has said about it, the penalty was deserved as he had mis-timed the challenge. Doesn't really matter as it was saved, just want to know whether other people reckon it was a penalty or not.
     
    #1
  2. josewwfc

    josewwfc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2011
    Messages:
    2,126
    Likes Received:
    105
    its difficult as he got a slight touch on the ball at about the same time as he made slight contact with the player. penalty or not, its never a red card as its not an obvious goalscoring oppertunity as the balls going away from goal
     
    #2
  3. wandermagic

    wandermagic Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    446
    Likes Received:
    2
    I was in the Frank Adams and it looked a clear penalty from there. Haven't seen a replay yet to confirm. I was worried about him being sent off or then carried off after the foul on him, bringing up the problem of no keeper on the bench. It's a risk and I can see why we do it given the 5 sub rule, but it will cost us one day.
     
    #3
  4. Finchyblue

    Finchyblue Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2011
    Messages:
    290
    Likes Received:
    11
    Definite penalty, which I think is confirmed by no other Wycombe player aside from Bully complaining to the ref.
     
    #4
  5. devonblue

    devonblue Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2011
    Messages:
    576
    Likes Received:
    5
    Only saw it on tv but a definate penalty IMO. The striker went down like a sack of sh*t though :)
     
    #5

Share This Page