We constantly get ITIWRAN on our board with his bilge, so TOUGH TITTY, Pontpricky!.......................
I don't think you mean bilge - perhaps bile? Not the sharpest, clearly. How come ITI hasn't been banned? A change in policy over in Pyongyang?
Phil - this post from you is exactly what I was referring to on another thread. We don't need your silly little quips when we're trying to discuss matters that only concern this club. Are you trying tp reduce every thread to a slanging match? Do us a favour mate, and return to the poster you were back on the old 606. Up for a joke and a laugh on the threads that ask for it, instead of derailing discussion threads over here with your childlike wumming. I remember those interchanges of old with you. As much as I argued with him, even old Aussie was up for the craic at that time. How things have changed. Don't see Aussie over here at all now for the sharp exchanges, but you've just sunk to Playschool level mate. As PPBB said - if someone over here posted your sort of **** on the jack board, they'd be banned by now. No need for that at all - just give it a ****ing rest.
Could it be that ITI stays on subject matter when it comes to theads Phill you lying bastard. Sorry Spark. Had to be said.
What's up with you these days? On the Everton board calling them girls, constantly sniping, and infighting on your own boards. Mellow out a little!
No need to apologise Bob - I've seen the treatment you've been given over there by the mafiosi. Phil is very mild by comparison, but he seems to have regressed back to childhood.
The problem he's got is that we are discussing a concept he doesn't understand, paying off debts. It's not something they're used to.
We are starting to get some old posters back on this board but I fear that it may be short lived will the childish posts from dragonphill. I'm not one normally to ask for bans but phill adds nothing to these boards so lets get rid. http://www.not606.com/announcement.php?f=55 We have to abide to these rules on the Swans board so they should do the same on ours.
Im not one for bans either and would advocate not banning tbh - just ignore him. That said, he does disrupt threads, so if the consensus wants rid lets do it.
Not one for any sort of bans on an open forum - certainly not for Phil who's not viscious, he just doesn't know when to stop. If he doesn't realise what an arse he's making of himself, just let him carry on and prove it.
the way i modded our board was to give temp bans to people if they went to town with the wumming. i dont want our board to descend into a place where no light hearted stuff is allowed, dragon is generally tongue in cheek and there is a difference between that and some of the bile spouted by twats on their board towards us.......
I agree Swamp, Dragon is the least of our worries and most people have generally sussed out his light hearted manner. Temp bans could be a way for those who persevere a bit more. Good idea. Though it does appear that most of this is caused by the fact that the Jacks board is a general hell pit and has issues with itself. Anywho, back to the topic in hand. Why don't we seem to have any big Sam backers here or Annis Abraham looneys? One of the Hull fans pointed this out a couple of weeks ago? Post #26 http://www.not606.com/showthread.php/209132-Prediction-League-Hull-City-(A)/page2
On the old 606 we prided ourselves on the Cardiff board by not running to the mods, while some Jacks made a habit of doing just that. Seems they've brought that across with them, Hopefully Drag on/Drag off will spend a bit of time looking at his posts of late and realise what a dick he is being, otherwise we might have to make a decision about him, I hope it doesn't come to that. Daiswan is a character who should be tolerated at all times, he might be wrong most of the time but it's usually football talk with farstretched imagination thrown in. As for the topic, I really hope Sam will be gone for good soon, that time is done.
sheep apart from one misunderstood soul on here, i dont think anyone here is a football hooligan who would have been thick enough to have been taken for a ride by a crook, and be grateful for it. as for the arse licking crew, one said that he was involved in a 'private' fight in the euros, not the fight in which he was accused of, or something, writes several books about hooliganism and is the sort of fan that has been exposed for what they are, thugs with no interest in football, only in getting pissed and starting fights. by the way, check this out, i look at the first thread on their board and they go to town with the abuse of one of their own! http://www.not606.com/showthread.php/211292-Man-utd-Lucky-****ers-!! and dai is the one getting banned, ok..................
Well he did have an opinion that differed from theirs? that seems to be enough by the look of it. They have established a dictatorship of a type, fall in line with their thinking or get banned seems to be the motto. Very poor board if that's how it is.
Definition of a Witch Hunt. I think I should just ban the lot of you and create a dictatorship to challenge the Swans Mhhahaaaaaa
It will be great when this board returns to football. This has all the makings of a long boring summer.
