Could you translate your gibberish? Fact is both work for the media and are paid to be controversial. Everything they say while working should be ignored as they are paid to do so. Its noy mutv where paddy crerand is so biased he makes phil thompson and niall quinn look neutral. Neville, scholes, yorke, Schmeichel, keane etc all try too hard to appear neutral. They do this by having digs at united. Last season neville spoke of the united way. It became very clear from the off he was talking unmitigated levels of bollocks. Scholes is doing much the same. Like a bunch of old men complaining about 'their day'. Theres a comment from scholes recently regarding youngsters. Cant remember it but it sums up scholes perfectly. Basically weve lost our identity and kids have no chance at united... Played the most youngsters of any club.......... Incredible player, ****** of a pundit.
Any of you actually read what he 'wrote'? He made some prescient points. NONE of which were slagging off or ripping into United.
His latest comments? I have yes. And his others. Hes not going to say he needs time to rectify the **** up last season as its too boring and basic. So he goes the not good enough route which is fair enough.
Neville (Gary) IS neutral, Scholes hasn't really got the full grasp of balancing it out yet, Yorke calls United WE and is far from neutral or attempting to be so, Keane remains very bitter at having to leave so has an axe to grind and Schmeichel is just a ****ing idiot. Absolutely thick as ****. How anyone can suggest City are a bigger club because they've won a few games yet can't fill their stadium and certainly aren't even close to a full trophy cabinet is verging on the ridiculous. I bet he can barely spell his own name.
Exactly. He's got a point too. As for what he says about Di Maria, he's also got a point. He's not playing well and doesn't look happy, it's pretty bloody clear to me. Scholes needs to see the chances being given to Blackett, McNair, Wilson and Januzaj though and **** up about us having sold Welbeck (who while with us wasn't good enough), that much is true.
Di maria simply isnt a winger. He needs to play in midfield where hes able to influence the game more. However we only have a few wingers, one of which is dire. Hope lvg puts him back in midfield against arsenal.
Yeah, so do I. van Persie has had his chance and so has Fellaini now, bring Herrera back in and put Rooney as striker with Mata at ten. Di Maria though has to fit into that midfield and if Blind and Hererra are also in it it might not be central.
I would also add Carrick to that. He was the one positive yesterday and supported something I said last week about having him partner either Herrera or Blind. I think there's a real glimmer that Carrick can resurrect his place now he has some quality in midfield which he's lacked over the last 2-3 seasons. But LVG needs to learn from yesterday. We had 5 attacking players yesterday and only 1 recognised Central midfielder (Carrick) while there were 2 sat on the bench. How can you get the balance that wrong.
Good point. I think Carrick and Hererra would play well together. Blind at centre half for now til we get some actual centre halves fit. I'd have Di Maria Mata and, for now, Januzaj in front if those behind Rooney. Get Falcao fit and Rooney drops back with Januzaj back on the bench.
