Daily Mail really are awful. Next door neighbour reads the Mail and is very weird. Tells you all you need to know. Lost all respect for the Mail when their front headline said that 150 soldiers died so people could vote and only 800 people BOTHERED! Most appalling piece o journalism I've ever read!
Also, the last paragraph is bollocks. Would Solskjaer really bothered if the owner stopped supporting the club. Wouldn't make any difference to Solskjaer if he's at Villa.
I've tweeted a link to David McNally asking if he wishes to comment! I did it mainly to let him know what's been reported so he can sue the arse off them!
These papers really need to get better lawyers in as I doubt the current lawyers even know the meaning of defamation!
If the Daily Mail said you were going to sign Rhodes and Ricky Lambert you lot would would be doing cartwheels. Norwich fans motto; If we like it, belive it. If we don't like it, rip it to shreds. PS. It's my birthday today, so when you respond, be kind.
**** off You may underestimate us fans Monarch as we do not typically believe all we see and hear - really, we don't PS - Happy birthday ye old bugger
I believe what I want to believe and I don't want to believe this article because its rubbish! Happy Birthday
It pains me greatly to say this, but Colon_mike is more accurate than some of the tabloid press muy feliz cumpleaños, que el césped de edad
Just say happy birthday you ****ing polyglot! Felicitations monarch, at last, someone who is older than me!
Dear me, why is it that newspapers seem to be able to write whatever like like, even if as in this case, it is total and utter bollocks and a pack of lies ? Check out the comment from Andrew,Norwich at the foot of the article. Pretty much sums the whole thing up really P.S. I'm ashamed to say, my father has read the Daily Mail for over fifty years and as he believes every thing they publish, the poor old boy is probably going to be beside himself when he reads this <shakesheadindespairemoticon>
What is the point of the 'comments' section being pre-moderated If the frickin' paper can make up crass lies and get it published why can't Joe Public have their say without censure I've just added a comment, but it takes ages to register - and I'll probably get 'modded' anyway.
Haven't the papers learnt not to mess with McNally following that article about us apparently about to go into admistration?
Here's the latest comment on the offending article. This one's straight out of the Colon_mike book of 'glass completely empty' twaddle! Seat belts on, chaps
