Chelsea play a negative system designed to kill the game and nick a goal. The counter attacking suits Mata, it's the defensive elements of Chelsea's play that don't suit him. Mourinho will only make room for one non-defending player and he's chosen Hazard over Mata.
he is tracking back , but is not that good defensively and conceding many fouls regarding your style, I think counter facing teams that park the bus will mot work , that is about 85% of your matches during a season no wonder why your strikers are not scoring alot
Counter attacking doesn't always start from the back. That's why we press so high up on the field, liverpool being an example.
Liverpool are a one man team everyone trying to create half of chance so Suarez finish them ..I think you have totally different equation, no wonder why so far there is little difference between both sides despite you have much better players and you spend more .. may be it is time to question if you should use the same style, I can see why Liverpool do it, but don't get why you do it
How did you get on against liverpool again? You have the much better players but still couldn't beat them?
we didn't spend as much as you guys ... but despite that, this was not an excuse to sit down and play using liverpool style I think it fit your team better bcz of negative football Jose love to play with, but imo, with a better manager using right style he would had made a better use of quality players you have in the squad
What are you prattling on about Shwan? We've scored 46, Suarez has got 20.. When horses head or since then Rooney or RVP or whoever scores the majority of Utd's goals does that make them a "one man team"? Sturridge has got 8 of the remaining 26 and other team/squad members the other 18. Rooney has scored 9 of your 32 so far, plus RVP's 7 leaves 16 scored by the rest of your squad, looks like Utd rely more on their main striker/strikers for goals than we do. #onemanmanutd