Quite agree Swanny, and I'm sure there must be a way to win this war but it most certainly isn't by dropping bombs out of planes.
The bloke at the stadium in Paris was denied entry wasn't he Swanny?
The Americans, and now it would seem the Russians, quite often have no idea as to exactly who they are bombing?
Thank you, but yes, as you say, 'loons abound', scores of whom are crossing the Austrian/Bavarian border each day. But it is good to hear your street is free of the Taliban, you are indeed fortunate. You comment "Last night was horrible,but was that even a threat to the French national security...NO!!..a tragic incident that lasted for an hour." Tell that to the bereaved families of this latest IS terrorist atrocity.
I might have been rude to you on occasions, but have never stooped to the level of calling you a 'loon', just because I disagree with your analysis of a situation.
I should add also that I fundamentally disagree with the views of both OddDog and TopClass on this subject. Firstly, because there is no comparision here between the past Vietnam, and indeed the Korean, conflicts, absolutely none. Secondly, there is no time left to examine the 'root causes' of why religious fanatics deem it necessary to publically cut the throats of innocent, and brave, people, and to terrorise in general. But I do not call either of them 'loons'; they are fully entitled to their opinions.
American policy has become very simple. They perceive that the way to deal with ISIS is to behead the monster. They use targeted air strikes – usually by unmanned drones rather than risking pilots – aimed at the leaders of ISIS, whom they track down by spying on them electronically.
Russian policy is pure and simple support for the Assad regime, which they have armed for decades. At the moment they generally target the rebel forces rather than ISIS; however, the downing of the holiday jet may see some movement in their position, although the target may be Egyptian ISIS if they conclude that they are to blame.
If the West wants to slow ISIS down they need to start taking measures to starve them of funding. We know that they receive funding from Sunni Muslim sympathisers in places like Saudi Arabia and they generate funds by selling captured oil and antiquities on the black market.
As it stands, it has been reported that one of the jihadists was a Syrian, one was an Egyptian and one was a French-born of Algerian descent whom the authorities already had under surveillance. The German security services must be having kittens wondering just who Angela Merkel has invited to live there.
As French police have located the car that some of the jihadists used to get away, it is only reasonable to conclude that the eight dead jihadists are not the whole cell and there are now an unknown number of terrorists loose in France.
I stand by my remark about the threat to National Security though...it wasn't and isn't regardless of the terrible loss of life on Friday evening.
.................Leave it to the towel heads to sort out their own mess.It should be nothing to do with us or anyone within 1000 miles of us.
Have to admit I had to look up 'asymmetric' and discovered asymmetric war to which the author refers to in his article. Cannot think of a solution apart from massive air strikes plus the cliche of boots on the ground to inflict a massive defeat on IS or whatever they are currently known as. We would have to be very vigilant in all European states and possibly have to expect some more attacks as in Paris until IS is predominantly 'defeated'. The difficulty is how would the rest of the 'Muslim World' would react to what they may see as a Crusade by the Christian West.It should be, but unfortunately it is a lot to do with us now. Here's an article from Deutsche Welle's chief editor which puts things far more eloquently than I could ever manage:
http://www.dw.com/en/opinion-an-asymmetrical-war/a-18852015